Calia quite literally and clearly stated that the Forsaken are the heirs of Lordaeron. What else is there to discuss on the matter?
Ainhin straight up compared Calia to Arthas. I can not and will not entertain this level of denial and mental gymnastics.
The number of heirs can be disputed.
Mental gymnastics
And you shouldnât. Weâve known the forsaken were heirs to lordaeron since Warcraft 3. And like you just said, thatâs not up for debate, ever. Keep being the awesome forsaken fan that you are hun. 
Why is the number of heirs mental gymnastics?
Is what she mean truly lost to you?
I think sherns translator is borked or he doesnât understand
Kalia?
I donât know what she said. Presumably, Kalia named the Forsaken heirs, without denying the right of succession to the living.
Both? Both.
Trolling through a borked translator.
I believe in Google translator and my stupidity.
There are interesting results though (call Kalia potassium).
@Renautus, the word for military sexual assault rhymes with tape?
Are you truly confused or are you pretending?
She proclaimed that the Forsaken are the true heirs, but you want to dispute her claim because she didnât name an heir in the traditional sense? Do you honestly donât know what she is saying?
I donât know Kaliaâs line about the Forsaken and inheritance rights. I use the memory of other peopleâs statements on this matter.
I do not perceive the phrase âtrue heirâ as âthe only heirâ. Legally entitled to inherit, without priority in inheritance when compared to other âtrue heirsâ.
She literally says that Lordaeron belongs to the Forsaken. Geeezzz, are you going for the gold medal in mental gymnastics event?
Do you really want to talk about the priority of inheritance because they are a nation and not individuals? Are you Kidding me?
No, Iâm interested in doing forum mental gymnastics.
Yes. Two crowds of heirs are fighting for the right to live in their parentsâ apartment.
No, Iâm not kidding.
She did not name the Alliance as heirs. Where did you get that from?
Edit:
She straight up says the Forsaken are the true heirs, she did not name another kid/crowd
Refugees from Lordaeron. End.
Itâs funny. Wage a war for territory with a group of refugees.
So there is one line in the Heirs of Lordaeron list: Forsaken. It remains to wait for the start of the legal proceedings in order to establish the exact number of those who have claims to the possession of Lordaeron.
The only heirs she proclaimed are the Forsaken
^^mental gymnastics
Yes. And this is interesting.
I believe in the book she mentioned the refugees as well, but both are recognized, but she accepts the undead as the present heirs to Lordaeron since they make up the majority. She doesnât ignore the living or their claims, only that the undead Lordaeronians have a more pressing claim. I think if it was 50/50 she would stay in the middle and since we donât know the exact numbers.
She does not, she quite plainly stated that Lordaeron belongs to the Forsaken and that they are the true heirs to Lordaeron.
Iâm not sure why yâall are adding legal proceedings and refugees to her statement.
This is nuts
Enjoy your âLâ symbol on a metadata-ish map, but if you want to continue the Lordaeron story from a PC perspective roll Forsaken. We actually have the backing of the last of the royal family.