What would that even matter if you don’t personally run into someone with the achievement or not. Lmao. It doesnt.
They are the same questions because they were both directed at you.
It also doesn’t answer my question still because it would serve no difference than running into someone with KSM. So again, why have 2 achievments for the same rating? It serves no purpose.
Because not every player actually wants to do M+?
You of all ppl should know that representation matters for everybody. Ppl play games to waste time for entertainment . Just because you don’t play NBA or Baseball doesn’t mean you don’t want your team to win .
" They " and " you"…I can’t help you here mate
Which exists through the achievements that already exists. You are still refusing to answer the simple question.
*You suggested they change the achievment to 10%.
*That change would make the cut off slightly higher than KSM and largely below KSH.
*Why would it make sense to have two achievments for nearly the same rating.
So all players who do M+ gets KSM and KSH? that means actual value is like 100 % of the participants 
that would definitely make it a participation trophy then and make it a joke
Yes
So ?
Why would it make sense to have two achievments for nearly the same rating
What is preventing this from happening bro, we are going in circles again .
Circles because you can’t answer a simple question.
The answer is: There is no purpose for 2 achievements with nearly the same requirements. There is no purpose for an end of season reward, for progression, to be lower than KSH.
Your version of the end of season achievment already exists as KSM.
The purpose is you get two or one achievement depending directly upon the skills set of the playerbase who do M+
KSH is irrelevant the achievement is calculated directly from % value of certain ppl who achieve a certain rating that is all
I am not equating KSM > ,= or < achievement than this title.
I am just saying this title needs to be give to top 10 percent of the player base instead of 0.1 so it matters and not to a point that its non existence
Which those forms of achievements already exist with KSM and KSH.
Again you did not read what read what I said, it has nothing to do with KSM or KSH . it is a separate achievement awarded to the player based purely on rating.
SO IS KSE, KSC, KSM, AND KSH.
Separate to this title achieve yes it is . But KSM/ KSH achievement is not a requirement to get this title
It is if players are pushing keys beyond KSM and KSH. They will have it by default.
You basically want a duplicate Achievement that serves no purpose at all.
If and only if they are the 10%. if the skill set is such that 10% comes within KSH /KSM range then congratz you get both .
There are no ifs. We have the numbers. Your suggestion is pointless.
Then congratz to the 10 % , you have something that 90% of the m+ player don’t have along with the Keystone achievements.
A pointless duplicate KSM achievement. Why would they do that instead of making an achievement higher than what is already available?
Your 10% number makes no sense based on the data. It’s a number you pulled out of thin air and defending for no real reason.
I’m with Sôsari, you’re essentially saying to add an additional tier in between KSM and KSH at the expense of a tier above KSH (making KSH, a pretty widespread and accessible milestone for people who actively run M+, the highest tier).
Those arguing for it being spec/class top 0.1% made far more sense.
Its not duplicate . One give you a mount ad other a title. One is based on a fix rating and completion the other based on percentage. You should know this
They happen to coincide that season doesn’t make them duplicate
10 % means 90% doesn’t get it . its still exclusive . Its common sense . I don’t have to defend basic maths here.
Except KSM already awards a mount and title.
We already went though this. Based on the date it would end up being basically 2 achievements for nearly the same requirement. Pointless.
Your 10% number makes no sense based on the data. It’s a number you pulled out of thin air and defending for no real reason.