See, we’re already halfway there. Blizzard just has to flip the switch, because they objectively do exist in lore.
Again, it’s not going to happen. The undead paladins that exist are exceptions to the rule. There are special circumstances behind each of them. None of which can be easily replicated to give the Forsaken a new class to mess around with that heavily conflicts with their lore.
1 Like
They’re the people of Lordareon. They literally invented paladins. NOT having paladins is what heavily conflicts with their lore.
Hahaha, no.
That is the weakest argument you’ve made in this thread, and you’ve made some incredibly weak arguments.
This makes no sense.
It makes no sense that the people who invented a fighting style would use that fighting style?
So I guess you think Pandaren Monks make no sense as well then.
The Forsaken didn’t invent Paladins.
Like I said:
They did though. They didn’t call themselves the forsaken at the time, but it’s still the same people.
Another nonsensical argument? Really?
So now we’re diverting to Pandaren for… reasons? Look man, if you’re going to try to debate, make sure the points you’re debating are strong, that you are well grounded and know what you’re talking about, and whatever you do don’t move the goalposts the moment your arguements start getting pulled apart.
But they’re not the same people. They’re now something that is hurt by the Light.
Still the same people.
Sure it’s harder now, but that doesn’t change the fact that they literally invented the fighting style so if anyone were to use it it would be them.
It just hurts more than it used to. Which wouldn’t be a problem for the most devout of the devout, which is what paladins are.
Honestly you’re best to just stop arguing with them, it’s a massive waste of your time since they very clearly have no idea what they are talking about and therefore wouldn’t be able to understand the arguments that counter them.
It’s rude to assume someone is incapable of reason just because they disagree with you.
I expect to be debated based on the merits of my argument, so I shall do the same.
Right, we don’t know what we’re talking about when we’re citing the lore and talking about cold hard facts.
You’re a disgrace to your character name. You don’t deserve it.
You’re not though. You’re talking your opinion on cold hard facts and deflecting the mountain of evidence that the conclusion you drew was wrong.
The only person talking opinion here has been you.
And whenever anyone has pointed out facts to you which go against the narrative you’re trying to create, you’ve either moved the goalposts, or made nonsensical arguments.
I have done neither of those things. That’s just what you call it when I prove you wrong so you don’t have to acknowledge it.
You shifted the goalposts when you started bringing up the ghost paladin in the paladin class hall, since that ghost is not Forsaken, and you’ve been arguing for Forsaken paladins this entire time.
And you’ve made two nonsensical arguments. That Forsaken paladins should exist because Lordaeron created Paladins and when you were called out for that nonsense, you countered with more nonsense about Pandaren not being monks.
It’s literally written here in your post history. Unless you want to edit those posts to hide the drivel you vomited into the thread.
No problem, all me to elucidate - they infuse mechanical abilities with life drawn from nature. So their swim form becomes a submarine or a torpedo, the flight form a copter, the travel form a mechanical creature, their feral form a mechanical cat, the tank literally a tank and the balance form a turret.
A gnome can dream…
That is not what was happening in any of those cases, but they’re real convenient ways for you to pretend you have a case.