It’s people like that… really should uninstall the game. Complaining because they are a bad player at literally everything lol
Better yet how about they delete the Beast Mastery rune? Theres already Kill Command and Beast Mastery talents.
Pets scale with the hunters level and stats. Don’t see why they would get weaker as the hunter levels. If anything they’ll be even more busted at 40.
The real question is, why are you killing an afk? Are you that desperate for HKs or that unsuccessful at fighting people actually playing the game?
Its a game get over it now if it was you being able to take some one out like the hunter pet you would not complain
As a BM Hunter on a PvE server, I sincerely request that you stop making threads complaining about pets in PvP situations and then sub sequentially they get nerfed because of the complaining.
You rolled on a PvP server, on the fun server, that anyone could have guessed would be wildly unbalanced. I’m sorry that YOUR chosen main class isn’t the current “meta” one.
Stop advocating for the death of an entire spec in all game modes and on one of the most popular classes (Beast Mastery/Hunter) because of level 25 PvP. Thank you.
4 Likes
Its time to take a serious look at hunter pets
They’ve been nerfed how many times now? And you think they haven’t had a “serious look”?
Sounds like you never played back in the day. Current state of Hunter pets is nothing compared to what it once was.
Lmao another one of these? Its funny because its always a rogue making the post too.
no way a geared warrior will kill you in 3 globals unless they are max rage and even then each hit has to magically crit
Nope, just lazy.
Sinister Strike weaving between Saber Slash is factually more DPS (and how I play) but from what I understand it’s about a 1~ DPS increase (not percent, just 1) so generally not worth risking your dot falling off (parry/dodge/cc/etc).
That all being said, there’s nothing wrong with weaving Sinisters to create a more interesting playstyle with slight increase in damage.
The irony is that the other person tried bashing them for not reading their abilities when clearly they should have been the one reading them as it’s pretty obvious that weaving sinister strike is (marginally) better on wording alone.
So many ‘would be’ sweaty players just follow some random guide as if it were gospel, never able to think for themselves, without ever doing actual research. Just “wElL tHe ToP dPs Is DoInG tHiS sO iT mUsT bE tHe BeSt”.
You have to understand, just because the ‘best’ players or even a lot of players are all doing the same thing doesn’t mean it’s the optimal play. Just means that’s the method some player(s) decided was best for them. Using your example, look at classic WoW today vs 17 years ago. The would be top parses then were doing VASTLY different things to what is done today.
You lack the vision to ever be truly good or even to innovate, you’ll only ever be another sheep and that’s okay, the world needs sheep. Just remember in the future, just because you don’t understand something doesn’t give you the excuse to be toxic. And always ALWAYS ask questions and do research. In everything, not just WoW. In life as a whole. You’ll be a lot happier (or more miserable, ignorant is bliss after all).
I’ll check back for the obligatory “too long didn’t read” or “I ain’t reading all that. I’m happy for u tho. Or sorry that happened.” or any of the other stereotypical sheep responses.
Either way, to you (and anyone who made it this far) have a wonderful rest of your day.
I mean the dude is doing grey parses, clearly not ready for ss weaving.
That’s neither here now there. Same as people being the top not necessarily being the best, people at the bottom aren’t necessarily the worst. More accurately, it doesn’t mean they shouldn’t try to do better. Someone will ALWAYS be a grey parse. No matter how close the are to the top spot. That’s just how parses/percentiles work.
That all said, I’m not making an argument that this person knows what they’re doing as it’s entirely possible they could just be bad. I was just making the argument for SS weaving as well as recommending to take ‘top parsers’ with a grain of salt.