That could be the case, as there isn’t a good reason to be against it.
5 Likes
ooooo…edgy for a 1 post alt. lol
As a tmog collector whose end game IS mogging…yeah…just do it
There is no valid, rational reason to be against it…just edgy edgelords doing that thiing where they say something contrary just to be edgy, lmao
THAT…that right there is the biggest reason any argument against removing most tmog restrictions is a ridiculous fight.
I can remove ALL of my mogs entirely and run around in my skibbies where they CANT EVEN SEE my armor pretty much at all…lmao…but in here screeching “MUH IMMERSION” …and I got $100 bill that says at least a few of the ‘immersion’ sorts were actually FOR hiding most of the armor slots…TOTAL contradiction making any fight here abject hypocrisy for those like that.
I can nearly totally HIDE my armor…and no screeching about THAT in here…but “muh immersion” if I want to use a leather chest on my hunter L M A O
1 Like
Plenty of good reason to be against it, you just don’t think there is because you want said thing to happen.
Theme is always a good argument. If someone loses their way, it doesn’t mean they have to be lost forever.
1 Like
I’d be curious as to what a good reason would be? Other than just not liking the idea.
Orc warlocks look great in plate, just saying. And all races look twice as good in evoker sets than Dracthyr do, for the obvious reason that they can only wear it half the time.
1 Like
If the community doesn’t like the idea, then it’s a a good reason not to do it. I’m sure it’s pretty split and doubt everyone or even the majority wants to give rogue and mage sets to paladins and warriors, and vice-a-versa.
Not to mention immersion and taking unique looks out of the game for the most part.
I dunno about that. Half the community is only happy if everyone plays the game their way. Not sure if that is the half I would want to cater to. Adding options is always better, especially considering some of the things you can already do ingame. I will never understand the conceit of not letting players wear what they want, but do let them go naked.
3 Likes
Adding an option is NOT always better…
Same can be said about your side of the argument.
Conceit? Lol what?
So, people aren’t allowed to be naked? It makes more sense than a warlock running around in druid gear… hell a $2 dollar and 25 cent as a single currency note makes more sense than that argument.
Not really, no. My desire to play the game my way doesn’t equal forcing others to as well. That’s the difference. And I wasn’t saying people shouldn’t be allowed to be naked, I was saying it was absurd to allow that but not tmogging a plate chest into a shirt.
I’ll repeat myself, “Same can be said about your side of the argument.”
You want it a certain way and are getting upset because it’s not… pretend all you want.
Your side is no different from mine… we both want something and want the other to not get what they want.
I also know the definition of conceit, you used it poorly.
1 Like
Oh boy. Are you missing the point strategically or accidentally? One side is saying “I want to do things my way and you can do things your way. Then we can both be happy.” while the other side says “No, you do things my way or I won’t be happy.” If you still can’t tell the difference, then okay. Logic doesn’t work on willfull ignorance.
2 Likes
No. There’s already way too much homogeneity in this game.
“He doesn’t agree with what I said, so he’s missing the point!”
I’m not gonna repeat myself again, you keep saying this but it’s no different, you want things a certain way and I don’t… if you didn’t care, then you’d go away and stop arguing for no reason.
Stop being willfully ignorant.
1 Like
Yours is willful ignorance it is, then. Not my problem.
2 Likes
Sounds like a pot calling the kettle black.
1 Like
If you say so. Right now, I am simply wondering how committed you are to getting the last word. It a game I play with my younger relatives.
1 Like
I used to play the same game with my sister, now I tend to play it with immature forum posters who love to act like they’re on some moral and/or intellectual high ground.
2 Likes