Strange hill to die on, but whatever 
youâre the one who died here 
1 Like
I simply pointed out that the image under our trinkets are ears, just like hands are under gloves, feet under boots etc etc⌠there was no argument to be had.
Do me a favor. Go in game and unequip one of your trinkets.
Come back and tell all of us what the picture is in the empty slot.
(Itâs an earring)
1 Like
I mean Blizzard could make a dozen or so ring models and have it shared between all the current rings and just have new models added with every tier.
There are a few glove mogs with rings baked on.
1 Like
Iâm pretty sure boomerangs, piccolos, and argent dawn commendations (to choose just a few vanilla trinkets) were never intended to be earrings. At some point the slot might have been intended to just be earrings but that is definitely not what it was at any point in live.
Do me a favour
log into the game, unequip your offhand weapon and tell me what the image is
1 Like
a small ornament (such as a jewel or ring)
2
: a small article of equipment
3
: a thing of little value :
1 Like
Very good!
This
might be the stupidest argument Iâve seen on GD.
Some really posh old ladies who still wish they were Audrey Hepburn.
i do like the mogs that show watches on your character, but then again, who is going to pay that much attention? let alone to rings. the only thing those being âvisibleâ is for your own piece of mind.
Just make all rings before now the same exact ring and start adding new ones from now on, no need to backdate the visuals.
Only one of those definitions doesnât apply to WoW.
Trinkets are one of the most valuable item slots.
What annoys me is that itâll override the new anniversary ring toy and the Black Ice toy.
Sauron???
The new blizz employee ring toy from the anniversary event.
Well, wouldnât it be weird to wear them under gloves?
no? people do that daily. they have wedding bands and other rings on, that go under their gloves.