Is horde just objectively better at the game?

I mean. What is the alternative? They made the racials better. They gave Alliance blood elves (because it was claimed this would help with player numbers).

For the average person, you can play either and typically be ok, and it would mostly depend on server.

Except M+ is not the only thing in the game.

Now do raiding.

You are telling me to cope while obviously…and very intentionally…not even reading what I am saying or putting things into context of what the OP is talking about.

4 Likes

Better nerf alliance racials cuz of the favoritism then

Do you have a percentage, per capita based metric we can use ?

No ?

Bummer uh.

It’s weird because Horde has a higher concentration of endgame focused people, at least for most skill brackets, and then it slants over towards Alliance at the high end because they have better racial abilities.

Really, though, faction doesn’t matter much these days. Once you get into that top 0.5 to 0.1% range then it may be considering swapping around for racials.

Got it.

M+ is the only thing to do in the game

to be fair i asked about raiding and pvp

Racials matter (at the top end) lol. In BFA, blood elf was best IIRC. Then they hammered Arcane Torrent.

Now, dwarf racial is OP. Shadowmeld is dumb too.

It’s the only thing we can effectively measure through a per capita system yes. Unfortunate (for Horde).

1 Like

Which is irrelevant to the OP and takes the entire question out of context.

Now, would you like to stay on topic?

I choose to play solo but when I have to group up I see all the rudeness… lol

He asked which was better. You have to use a per capita metric to measure who is better. Raw population makes it so Horde has more people and thus any static ranking will be filled with Horde players by default.

Statistics 101.

I am.

1 Like

Asked specifically about raiding and PVP.

You used m+.

Ok

Yeah it’s just a shame, they honestly should have not tried to delude themselves that doing that was enough. I sort of half figured with allied races blizz would give the opposite faction the racials they were missing but nope. Cross faction play really should have came 4 years ago but well they wanted a “pvp themed at launch” expansion.

Thread title remains threat title. I answered his question in the thread title.

Do you have any metrics for raiding ?

PvP you should be able to measure actually. Do you have the season cut offs per faction for top dogs ?

1 Like

What else would you suggest?

So you read the title, ignored the post. And just said “i will take it from here”.

Ok.

Moving on. Since you have shown you dont want to actually read the conversation, why should I continue?

No, let’s stay here a while. Let’s do PvP now. Oh look, a sort of 2 way tie for US/OCE :

Alliance wins RBGs, Horde wins Arenas.

Let’s check EU. And the Alliance with the big comeback in Arena :

Looks like a tie.

M+ tie breaker says Alliance still top dog.

Source : https://check-pvp.fr/cutoffs

2 Likes

Of course Alliance are dogs. I think they prefer being called Worgen.

BTW. I am not actually gonna respond to the content of your posts in this thread. Just take a random irrelevant part I like and go with it. Since that is apparently what you do too.

If you aren’t going to respond to the context of posts, why should I?

It’s ok, you thought your faction was best. I get it, pride kinda shattered there.

2 Likes

I would ask where I said that.

But we both know you dont read posts.

1 Like

As I said, them needing to rip the bandaids off earlier, and then mirroring racials so both factions had access to all. Things will settle down now since I really can’t see anymore necessary fixes to core design besides barriers created by code (not philosophy).

But things really won’t stabilize for another 3-5 years with my guesstimate.