Ah yes, voting in Grimrail.
and the other reason the forums (in their current form) is a bad solution: each person can vote over 100 times on a single sub.
Just make it like btag but separate. Same fourm identity regardless of character, but not tied to the bnet friend system.
Almost every time I see that suggested, you get a group who don’t know how btags work arguing that it’s a bad idea for completely made up reasons.
I’m sorry, you must have him confused with the last guy.
Imagine how bad the previous guy was that he lost to everybody’s least favorite other option.
Or imagine that you where TOLD he was so bad that it forced record turnout of voters who couldn’t even tell you a single name of anyone they voted for.
Both statements are somewhat true.
Btw, there’s solid polling that shows the old guy would have won if there wasn’t suppression of a certain story lol
I don’t know what world you’re living in, dude. Republican candidates are doing everything they can to cheat, and they’re still losing. Maybe that should tell you something about them and not everybody else.
Well, this turn of events was painfully predictable.
1 Like
The only thing they need to do with PvP is make it a CoD lobby like it always should have been.
There’s no “RPG” in PvP, having gearing affect it is stupid.
VOIP for PvP would be great
I don’t think it is in their interest to make this level of data about the game public. They do surveys from time to time, and they never share the results. This information could be used to support a lot of bad press and they don’t want that.
Implying I support Republicans?
I do not lol.
I don’t support either. I am politically homeless.
Feel free to think what you want, but, I’d suggest diversifiying your news sources. Perspective from each idealy. Progressive, Left, Classic Liberals/Center, Libratarian, and Right.
The death of civil discourse is the death of us all.
Assuming that the people who disagree with you are a minority is not a safe way of making business decisions.
“Right-wing news source” is a contradiction of terms.
Poll in game, open to everyone.
- # of evaluated voters: 385. Assume Gaussian distribution, should give you a CI of 95% with a ±5% of error, no matter the population size.
-
Sampling technique: Percentile based on # of achievement points.
Further refined by getting the top and bottom percentile of each target activity. - Use total votes as control for the sampled group. If they differ too much. resample.
This is never substantiated despite constantly being levied, though I would give it some measure of thought past team oriented thinking. Also it doesn’t really look good from the midterms that the second biggest private donor to one party to the tune of a few 10s of millions is also the same dude being nailed for the FTX scandal ongoing that has noticeably fallen off the radar of mainstream news around the time it was starting to implicate PACs.
Also the fact the party that screeches about the popular vote didn’t talk about it with these midterms and there’s a particular reason for that. It had less to do with their party or platform being favorable and more the turtle guy they call the fifth antichrist sabotaging populist candidates in a bid for power amidst a divided party undergoing ideological reform. Dude straight up dumped 9 million to protect Murkowski from someone in her own party and threw a handful of razor thin races that could have been won with a fraction of that money because he would rather lead the minority than have a majority but not be the leader.
Also you should probably look into the Twittergate stuff currently going on, and this isn’t anomalous because Zuckerberg hinted at the exact same talks with feds about “doing more to crack down on disinformation” around the time another scandal going on during election was making the rounds that we were told “wasn’t ever a thing” only for news outlets to admit “Yeah, that laptop was actually legit” two years after the fact.
Bottom line, yeah it isn’t really hard to win an election when the news refuse to talk at all about the shortcomings or mistakes of one candidate entirely, then the other one sneezes and it’s somehow a dogwhistle to some indefensible group of people. Then politically motivated intelligence agencies deeming any and all potential scandals as “disinformation” and shutting them down across social media so things that voters should probably be privy to don’t get that information as it might sway their vote.
1 Like
Ah, my bad.
You’re way to far gone to even have a discussion with. My fault.
Try me, though. What are you calling right wing news? Daily Caller? Fox? Are we going to make a distinction between opinion shows on the Fox News channel and the news programs that then report on the outrage generated by the opinion shows?
Like, have you not heard how conservative areas have made it more difficult for people who typically vote Democrat to vote at all — doing so in the name of “vote integrity”, while all actual cases of voter fraud in those conservative districts strictly turn up conservative voters —or do you need me to find some news articles for you?
Are we talking about Hunter Biden here? A quick search for “Hunter Biden” right now shows there are nude pictures of him? Is that the news here? Wait, did he really have shady business dealings? While not being in the executive branch?
There’s a difference between a scandal and misinformation. A priest that’s accused of sexual assault is a scandal. (I don’t need to provide a source for this, do I?) A gay lawmaker accused by MTG of being a pedo is misinformation. (Do you need the source on this one?)