Imagine not having a Tinker Class

I would trade alchemy as a profession for an alchemist class. :slight_smile:

And I would trade the Engineering Profession for an Engineer Class. But it’s not necessary.
There’s no reason Blizzard would remove a profession to make room for a class

That’s completely arbitrary. Like saying we’d need to give up a few races so we can go to a new zone.

I’m okay with not having a tinker class, honestly.

3 Likes

You don’t need to imagine. As wow doesn’t have any to play nor likely will it. Tinker with your engineering. :slight_smile:

1 Like

I would like a tinker class. As a trinity class.

Not sure where evoker came from, seems like something no one was asking for.

1 Like

Still not sure where the Tinker hate is coming from.

Would’ve been a better choice than some My First Dragon OC rejects.

lmao.

5 Likes

OP i agree, with you. While some people may dislike the idea of a Tinker i think we missed a great opportunity for it in BFA so we may have to wait awhile.

Makes sense to me. I propose we trade night elves for a huge alien desert.

Seriously though. An alchemist/tinker class would do what the profs do (thematically, not gameplay wise) but way better.

I’d be for both but it’s hard to deny there’s a lot of overlap theming wise.

But it’s soooo boring.

it’s not hate, people here are just sick of seeing endless threads about it

1 Like

Have you played one? How would you know that? I was unaware you were omnipotent.

Evokers are bad enough. They really need to take a step back and think long and hard before they add another class. Preferably one that isn’t tied directly into LGTBQ.

how is evoker tied into lgtbq? theyre dragons gay ppl aint dragons my person

1 Like

I’m just grossly indifferent. I don’t care about the dragons either. I would’ve been far happier if they put that effort into our current classes, and maybe even added a few new specs to those. Would’ve gone a lot farther than a new gimmick class, for me.

2 Likes

Tinkers have always sounded lame to me.

What? Lmao wow.

I’m glad they didnt go with Tinker, the word makes me wanna pee.

I’d take a tinker class over getting locked to being a wimpy dragon just to play the new class.

1 Like

Evokers feel like a failure to me, honestly.

They are like dhs were, where they do a lot of damage but they have the depth of a kiddie pool. Except they don’t have the “flair” or cool factor DHs have visually.

They also just look weird, like, genuinely feels off to me when I look at most of them. I tried my hardest to make a dignified, cool one and still couldn’t make it to my tastes.

That’s never gonna happen.
I’m pretty confident WoW is going to keep getting new classes until the day comes that Blizzard sends out that blue post saying the game is in “Maintenence mode”
New classes are a fact of life because they’re easier to make, and easier to advertise.

Yeah my biggest issue with Evoker is I can’t play a Race I enjoy to play an Evoker. I thought DH’s were Limited. :unamused:

Gonna need to explain how it’s easier to make a new class from the ground up with multiple specs than add a new spec to an established class with some baseline abilities already.