The put it in to be a hunter only raid for heroic, which would have never have happened during this expansion; especially when it was a secret thing that no one would have even tried.
1 Like
So anther words. Sense my views is wrong and yours is right. Other in here agree with you. I should just do as I am told and accept it. OK see you. Look up the word elite and come back.
1 Like
Well, I didnât say their original intent was smart. Itâs good and bad that they gave up on that⊠Bad because people spent a lot of hours trying to find this thing like it was a secret mount⊠Blizz invalidated everything they did by saying screw it and making this change.
I agree, entire hunter raid⊠never wouldâve gone well lmao. But, thatâs what I said in another post. Blizzards foresight on the things the implement seems to be non-existent these days⊠Itâs like they arenât even trying to foresee any potential issues when they implement something.
They only did it because a bug was found and some hunters were getting it via hearthing. They didnât particularly âgive upâ on it by choice.
None the less, it being from normal+ Zul is just telling that Blizzard want people to sell more runs and people to buy more tokens to buy those runs. Otherwise it wouldnât be in something like say, a raid.
2 Likes
Fix the bug vs. change their entire original idea.
Sounds like they gave up to me is all I was trying to get at.
I think the issue is that youâve yet to explain why a reward being tied to a certain type of content is bad. You just keep saying itâs bad. itâs bad. Killing subs. Itâs bad.
I donât complain when I donât get the mythic raid mounts. I donât do mythic raiding, but I accept that I wonât get that mount.
Mage polymorph tomes used to be in raid content back in Vanilla. Legendary items used to require countless hours of raiding. There have always been rewards for doing what Blizzard considers âend game contentâ. As there should beâŠ
1 Like
No you are. It called bigotry. Plan and simple. I guess I spell it out for you. You can sugar coat it, defend it, call it other things. In your mind you can even say it not true. it is.
Discrimination is the act of excluding people. We used to have literacy test. Guess what raiders have to do a raid? How about that guild you guys say let you join. Raid addon on come to mind. You not fooling me one bit. Oh but there pugs. Guess what pugs do. This is and will be a act of bigotry against anther player. I am not super coating one bit.
2 Likes
How disappointing. Just. Blood beasts went from super rad to âwhateverâ in one hotfix.
Iâm a filthy casual and this casual-pandering junk has got to stop.
I am not clear on how people get this - but people have claimed it is available in lfr as well.
LFR is false, it drops from normal and above currently.
Excuse me for being in a guild. Why do not you leave.
I can just imagine everyone on here saying itâs fine to tie certain rewards to certain content, if say the tome required 1800 rating in 3v3. Iâm sure the same people would continue defending it.
Entire hunter pet families are not the sort of thing that should be tied to a raid, when the vast majority of hunters donât raid. Mounts, gear, items, thatâs fine. A pet family?
Blizzard would never gate a pet family behind PVP, so it isnât right to go the other way either.
4 Likes
There is nothing discriminatory about it. They arenât preventing you from getting it you just have to do certain content to get it.
What you are claiming is sort of like someone figuring they should be a doctor without spending years in school and then claiming it is discriminatory because they arenât allowed to because they donât want to put the time/effort in.
3 Likes
If that were true it would be LFR, then anyone could get it without buying it. As is, anyone can still get it; but it just requires you to pay someone if youâre not a raider.
Thereâs still no effort being put in there.
2 Likes
Someone was saying it is available in LFR.
Itâs a reward. I donât care, let them put it behind a PvP reward. I think they should. Let PvPâers actually have a reward.
These new pets are, essentially, a cosmetic appeal. âbut, but, they have a new abilityâ. So? Is it going to change hunter game play in any way? No⊠For the vast majority of the player base, itâs cosmetic. For the small percentage who truly care about or need the new ability, they will have no problems doing a normal raid.
No one has to buy a run for this. Itâs a normal raid. I do it while watching netflix. Itâs a joke⊠And itâs not even the last boss.
2 Likes
Tons of people will. Tons of people already have, normal or heroic. Same people that bought AOTC runs, among other things for mounts, or that buy +10, +15 M+ runs.
OK if this was not a bad idea. then why they change it?
I am wondering if you area kid. Let do simple economics. not sure what I am here as I see this point less. But hey I have to try.
A. People hate the idea and decide to leave game.
b. People find a game more to liking and not return
c. One less person is 15 dollars less. We had 10 million paying 150 Million roughly a month. Now we have let say 2 million that paying roughly 30 million. 150-30 million is a net loss of 120 million a month.
d. company wants to do a patch. heads say no do to loss revenue or the say yes. Depending on factors.
e. company wants to do a expansion. Ok as long sub stay at 2 million.
f. sub go down to 1 million because of bad game designs. Now they only making 15 million roughly.
G. Guys goes to head and ask to do expansion. Company says no not enough money to justify expense. Guy says well expansion sell for 51 dollars. Company say make to 60 then yes.
H. The next one they do again subs goes down to 900 players. Again loss in money. he ask for expansion. company says no and will not raise prices because marketing said it hit maximum. You can instead do a patch once a year.
that is how bad it can get. well happen. We do not know. History on the other hand show it does happen.
2 Likes
But Blizzard never listens!!
1 Like
Trouble with your âtheoryâ is no one will leave over just this. Sure some people might leave because of this and 10 other things but if it wasnât this, for those people it would be something else that pushed them over the edge.
So no there is no negative economic disadvantage to them doing this.
2 Likes