Again, massive cherry picking and literally cropping out every possible part of the relevant discussion so as to fit your narrative.
You are literally the most functional example of a sociopath.
Again, massive cherry picking and literally cropping out every possible part of the relevant discussion so as to fit your narrative.
You are literally the most functional example of a sociopath.
A structured argument that provides an explanation for how the game mechanics work is actual evidence. Further, these are basic elements of the game’s mechanics. In fact, these are basic elements that can be verified in game right now.
You don’t understand what the word “evidence” means.
And it doesn’t matter. Because all you are doing is spamming non-stop.
Except, it really isn’t. If the person doesn’t believe you, then that would be the time to show them the proof. It isn’t their fault because they don’t believe you because you didn’t give them a reason to believe you.
I can easily say for example that “Ghostbusters (2016) has higher rotten tomato scores then Mortal Engines (2018).” And if your first response is “i don’t believe you” (if i didn’t post any proof) then i would post the proof when asked or pre-empitively. And then that person will click on it to confirm it for themselves and they will believe my claim. And i didn’t have to tell them to go google it up or anything.
(And in case anybody is wondering, yes, this is actually true that Ghostbuster 2016 has higher scores then Mortal Engines.)
In the event if i have to do tell people to google it up, for whatever reason there be, say like Blizzard decides “No more rotten tomato scores for you”, i will tell you “Put these into google and it’s usually the first link”.
It’s obviously gonna be different for a lot of things here, like this TBC tanking thing, so if your gonna tell me to google it, you do have to specify which website and what i’m suppose to be googling (which you done that part, you just didn’t say which website). And i say which website, because if i just googled the part you want me to look up without a specific website, i would get tons of different answers that may or may not possibly match up to what you’ve said. And it’s why before, during and after i looked it up, asked you to link them yourself since you seem to have a problem with people not knowing what their talking about… So why not just to set them on the right path by putting links if people not knowing what their talking about bothers you? Nobody would ever have a problem with you for putting in links to back up your claims. Infact, we would be happy if you’ve did that instead of just insulting or using ad-homs at us to distract yourself from ever doing that, because just saying it, isn’t enough.
You’re trying to treat this forum like it’s a court of law while at the same time, acting extremely ignorant to the point of displaying sociopathic behavior.
Once again, you are actively ignoring any purpose of this topic in every possible way.
There is nothing to discuss with you.
You either don’t understand the arguments being presented or you are actively engaging in ignoring them entirely, or both.
I mean, hell, most of the discussion is barely relevant to the OP anyway. And even then, most other people actually bothered to contribute to one particular discussion anyway.
All you’re doing is backseat moderation and spamming. That’s all. No one is going to take you seriously.
And to a previous point made earlier, if you don’t even understand the basics of the material in question, you have no right to demand that person take the time to explain those basic points. You are not a juror. Just because you don’t know anything, does not obligate people like me to explain.
Still waiting on you to prove your arguments. You can make all the ad-homs and insults all you want, but it’s not helping you in the slightest. If anything, it’s having the opposite effect here.
Like seriously, isn’t it just easier at this point to back your claims up with references (links)? I mean, this is common knowledge. I would look it up again for you, but the last time i did that, you don’t think it’s what you’re talking about or think it’s terrible.
I don’t need to prove my arguments. This isn’t a court of law.
How are you not getting this? This is a discussion forum. If you want to go looking for hard evidence, you would need to actually simulate the WoW client yourself.
And either way, the evidence I’m pointing to is clearly accessible via Google. The only reason I don’t post it is because it essentially points to ToS.
And again, it doesn’t change the fact that you aren’t contributing anything to the discussion.
I provide explanation about how the game’s mechanics works, which you are not even disputing.
That’s that.
Well i guess you don’t need to be correct i suppose. /s
Yea. It is a discussion forum. And what’s the definition of discussion?
the action or process of talking about something in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas.
And in that exchange of ideas, there’s naturally going to be agreements or disagreements. Which ties into arguing (which isn’t a negative thing at all as many of the people in GD like to imply), which where two or more ideas clash and to give reasons for or against. And how you go about these reasons? well say for example, if you are trying to say something is objective, you should back that up with proof or in writing, citation to references.
A discussion forum doesn’t mean you’re free from somebody telling you to cite or back up something.
Plus the terms discussion and argument is just terms to describe the tone of people talking to each other. It’s two ideas meeting each other and it’s either a disagreement, agreement, trying to reason for or against an idea, etc.
Maybe your referring to the private server forums here, considering you keep bringing up the “it’s against the ToS” thing. Because i did tried looking it up what your talking about again a few minutes ago, and i skipped over the private server forums because A, i don’t know if blizzard is okay with that, and B, i don’t want to rely on forums much for numbers here.
You didn’t provide any citations when asked, so we can’t confirm if what you’ve said is true or not. I can’t disput anything of yours if it’s not even true to begin with or lacking in the evidence that confirms it.
the fix to Classic-style boosting is TBC. As it means more people quest and it revitalizes the open world part of the game.
You can dispute based on actually playing the game in its present state. You don’t even need to play TBC to learn the basic elements of Rage generation, avoidance, TPS and tanking in general. Those are things that you people truly do not understand and therefore, pointing to changes made in TBC is useless, because you don’t even understand the basic idea behind those changes.
I’ll say this again, you are just spamming nonsense. You won’t engage, because you have no intention of engaging in a real discussion. You backseat moderate.
There is no point trying to correct you, or provide links to actually playing the game.
…I thought you were talking about TBC’s tanking. Also how can i dispute that by playing Classic?.. (assuming that’s the game your refering to)
I clearly am engaging, otherwise i wouldn’t make long and detailed comments to you, explaining my points and such. Maybe it’s on you for not paying attention all this time, which is just probable at this point since you keep on saying “i’m spamming” and ignoring this comment here because, shocker, i’m actually curious on why you can’t cite your sources to back up your claims and i’m trying to guess why not here with possible explanations that you keep on dodging to answer here.
So you don’t want to convince people then?
You are a troll.
You are spamming.
You are backseat moderating.
You are not even engaging in the discussion.
You are not trying to dispute anything I’m saying.
Oh, joy, more namecalling.
You’re literally telling me the same exact thing over and over.
I’m not a moderator, i already told you.
Kettle meet Pot.
I don’t agree with what you said because you still don’t give citation to support your arguments.
Now with this comment here, is this correct? Yes or No?
At literally no point did you even once contribute to the topic or discussion within the topic.
All you do here is spam.
https://media.giphy.com/media/K8zzqui9viWT6/giphy.gif
Since your refusing and avoiding that comment about asking you if it’s the private server forums that i’ve linked 3 times, i’l just assume you said “Yes, these are the links i want to post but it’s against the ToS”. If that’s not correct, then tell me which website to type into google to get our info about TBC tanks and such.
Once again, none of that really disputes anything I’m actually saying.
Also, a ton of that information is incredibly false.
The reason why you are not “directly” disputing “anything” I’m saying is because you understand none of that.
Good lord, that is some of the most useless, nonsensical information you could possibly give.
I’ll say it again. You’re just spamming. Not only are you not really arguing. You are just repeating the same useless information that has absolutely no value at all.
Then link us the true information then.
Or reduce the XP from dungeon mobs by 3X, and further another 10X when a character in your group is more than +7 levels higher.
The true information of what? You’re lacking in the basic information of how tanking works.
Go learn how it works by playing the game.
Then have discussions about it.
How are you not getting this?
You don’t even understand what you are asking for.
The information of the TBC tanking that you kept on talking about for the last 5 or so days.
Well funny that you say that, because i am an alto-cholic of nearing 40 characters, and have 20 or so at level 50 (level 120 back then). I have Hunters, Rogues, Monks, everything. And i even dabbled in Tanking and Healing here.
I do understand the basics of tanking here, that being ensuring the aggro is on the tank and position when needed so the allies won’t get hurt. To some degree, i understand the concept of rage gen from Warriors and DK and DH’s (since runic power and pain or whatever DH’s have acts pretty much acts like the warrior’s rage. TPS as well since i have tanked in LFR years ago and heroic dungeons on an occasion, because often times, healers or high dps can rip aggro off and i needed to get higher TPS as you say by improving my timing. Or let the other tank take the aggro when it’s time to swap aggro. (i just never heard of the term TPS before, but i can get an idea of what you mean here since it sounds like DPS but with Aggro.) Avoidance i assume you mean is positioning and defensive CD’s and such.