As
i said i could care a less, i can do other thing while waiting, hell i can even work while waiting. Multitasking is a good thing
the problem thich so many of you seem to think exists just isn’t there. You just don’t want to take effective strats offered by other Alliance players to work for victorious games. That tells me that there is a serious problem with defeatism with Alliance players
So yes there is a problem, it isnt the map. The map is fine
The problem is that Alliance players just don’t want to work for it
LOL that you are claiming alliance who we know are not any worse than horde are actively choosing a 5% win rate over the ~50% win rate they can get in the other two BG’s is the funniest thing you’ve said so far.
please… please… god… level an alliance… and then say something. i’ve played both sides… and this is my post you really are just so sure that your hordes 95 pct win rate is just because your players or are strategies are bad… can you not see the fault in that assumption? if you can’t then you have an issue with averages…
The battlegrounds are meant to be around 50/50 that’s what Blizzard said, they aren’t meant to cater to anyone… but this map DOES.
Diminishing returns? This just in bud: we are waiting for towers to burn. You get bonus rep and honor points for secondary objectives. It is not all about killing the generals. You would know this if you kept an eye on the rep ticks in your window. Burning these towers also removes war-masters.
Since Zyrius refuses to answer in the other thread I will ask you: how long a game is too long a game for alliance?
The win condition of AV is killing the enemy general. You can wait for towers to burn after the game is over. Just win the game…oh wait your honor and rep farming thats why you play.