Freedom of speech

Eh. To the point, I’ll actually reframe this in a way that maybe we can reach a consensus.

I think we’re in an “Is/Ought” discussion. With Corporate Interest determining the “Is” and Human Rights Principles sidelined as “Ought”. So any argument in favor of corporate prerogatives will have the upper hand de facto. Unfortunately, it will lack moral certitude because corporations don’t care about morality or principles. They care about profit first, last, and always.

One of the main problems with the Constitution is that the founders didn’t foresee the rise of huge multinational corporations. Until something is done to reign them in, this is what we’re going to be stuck with.