Non-issue. Even if you’re going to claim you have a crap ton of active people on at any given time, I’m willing to bet you have a ton of inactives. Not to mention you have 870 members as of now.
1000 is a good number.
2 Likes
Who are you and what have you done with the old Blizzard?
Not that I’m complaining . . .
1 Like
I already had it like, the first day it came out, but good on ya for that.
Good on the team for reversing it.
And thanks for the continued transparency.
3 Likes
I am SO impressed with this change. LOVE YOU GUYS. Thank you. 
1 Like
As a druid enjoyer, when I found out about this helm, I was sold!
1 Like
We don’t. And we have 870 because people are actively pulling their alts out. Logic is hard mmkay.
1000 is not good, it is far too little. Period. End of story. Not up for debate.
1 Like
Thank you so much!
Obviously it is fine since it’s been at 1000 for years. Period. End of story. Not up for debate.
2 Likes
Thank you for listening to feedback on this, you made this druid very happy.
The Good Ending. Thank you for going back and looking at that decision
Um I don’t think the Guild limit is affecting everyone.
People can just make a guild for Alts and a Guild for Mains, and link the chat with a Greenwall add on or something.
Maybe Blizz can make guilds cooperate/unite - that would have been a good thing back when I raided. Guild merges that let you share Guild Chat but be separate Guilds.
Sure you have a problem, but it is odd that you would hijack a thread and claim your problem is everyone’s problem.
This problem, the one in the topic, seems to affect everyone - even the Guildless.
2 Likes
Thank ya and my Druid thanks ya too