Right, but you have to prove that a discussion being held on forums dedicated to Burning Crusade Classic is the same as a Civil Case addressed by the context of US Law.
Just playing by your rules here.
Our legal process is built upon our norms and standards.
Where’s your proof?
Civics…
Still don’t see any proof. Sorry man.
You understanding proof isn’t a condition of there being proof.
You inability to provide proof is a condition to adding substance to whatever you say.
New ammunition for you, Belshaman:
So, that’s all you gotta say now. If he asks you for proof, just tell him he just doesn’t understand it.
If he tries to fight you on that, he’s a hypocrite.
post:2151, 2153, 2155, 2157
1 Like
The counter hasn’t even reached 2000, buddy.
Learn how to quote.
Blizzard I would pay money in the store for dual spec…
2 Likes
He’s terrible at debating. He moved to ad hominem attacks awhile ago. Which I call out also.
An argument lives or dies on it’s own merits. This thread dual spec argument died a long time ago. Scrolling up to find an argument for dual spec would take a long while.
You just can’t understand his proof.
This isn’t a legal proceeding in a court of law but essentially a debate where there’s a question with both sides equally attempting to make their arguments. The question is, Should Dual Spec be Added to TBC?
1 Like
I’ve always wanted to try Boomy, but my guild INSISTS I play Resto
we 
say no to dual spec
You slipped on the slope
3 Likes
Even if you suffer from multiple personality disorder, your vote still only counts as one. Ergo, “I” would be the correct personal pronoun!
Learn how to forums. When you posted this the counter on the right side (which ignores deleted posts) was at 2152. Your actual post was https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/dual-spec-please/1001694/2163 2163
2 Likes
Learn. How. To. Quote.