Dracthyr/Evoker Glyphs

Must say, it is extremely strange that Evokers have no glyphs whatsoever. While I doubt that Visage-centric combat glyphs will become a reality since it would be in direct confrontation with Worgen and their human forms, I can see it becoming a racial feature in general at some point.

Something I think would be hilarious is if Rewind got a glyph that caused all animations to play backwards for a few seconds.

Breath of Eons, and similar Bronze spells that cause bonus damage, summoning a “Future You” for an attack to represent the proc would be nifty.

There’s an idea… a glyph similar to Priest’s Confession, except you get “advice” from your Future Self that largely amounts to vague hints that could apply to almost any situation and useless commentary.

1 Like

so Non Evoker Dracthyr would imply lore wise they are expanding their reach. We just had a scalecommander get their visage day and refuse by choice but the other Dracthyr did not. Id say visage day is coming, its just something they will have to figure out how to do it.

ITS ALOT OF ANIMATION WORK aswell as visual work for races. Tauren with Dragon ears, goblins with fins, it honestly is alot and id hope they take this time to go out of their way and be like, ok we start on it now slowly and expand 3-4 races per faction at a time and eventually you can just be them all adding 2-4 per patch cycle (like heritage armor)… i would 1000% say this should be their heritage armor

tbh, I’d even be happy with just the regular race options except they have those funky dragon eyes that the NPCs do.

I totally agree. The living Flame (Green and Blue) would be absolutely fantastic.
Also a deep breath could give a lava spray like an actual dragon. That would look absolutely fantastic.

Please Blizzard make some Glyphs for Evoker. It’s not fair all the other clashes have but evoker.

I think it’d be fun if there were a glyph changing Emerald Blossom to depict the (Seed of Amirdrassil/Tear of Elune)

1 Like

First one’s already being applied to dracthyr non-evokers. Glyph of the blue flame, possibly emerald flame too I imagine would probably be classified as confusing to players, since devastation’s tree mentions an increase in damage for blue spells and I think preservation mentions green spells. Changing living flame to be blue or green would probably lead to at least a few people opening forums and asking why Living Flame doesn’t have increased effects.