It depends entirely upon what course she decides to take for herself.
Which is to say I don’t know what she would have done, because I don’t know how the world would have changed, and can only speculate.
Just like you.
That because some people cannot overcome the adversity with which they’re faced and fall to vice does not mean they are not responsible for the actions they commit.
And it’s irrelevant because one has to choose to act upon it to begin with in either case.
A person can be 99% likely to do something, and still just not do it, because in the end it is their choice.
Because there’s nothing to connect.
Arthas is not responsible for her actions in any way shape or form after she was liberated from the will of the Lich King, and so bears no guilt for them.
Sylvanas is the only one at that point that is responsible for Sylvanas’ actions, and so bears the guilt for them, because she then has agency.
Yeah its super plausible that living Sylvanas would do all those same things as a living breathing ranger general with an intact soul and ability to feel emotions.
Find me where I said that. I specifically said they should both share the same fate(whether that be damnation or redemption). Because Sylvanas of all people has gone and implied the only difference between her and the Lich King is she works for the Horde.
it’s almost like a stupidly literal view of “responsibility” doesn’t have much to say for itself and in fact only can repeat the same talking point without much constructive or salient thought
No, that’s only you.
I’m saying she decided to take the courses of action which she did after she had her agency back, not apropos of nothing naturally but ultimately they were her decisions.
Which she had to elect to allow to influence her.
Hence she has sole responsibility, and guilt, for her actions.
Or do you not believe she had that choice?