Dishonorable kills

WoW Classic WoW Classic General Discussion
21

Classic is about maximize the RP sensation, among other things. So, you will have to deal with your dishonorable actions, if you are going to do it.

2 Likes
22

you do realize all DHKs do is lower your honor rank?

so if you dont care about honor titles or pvp gear which is strictly worse than gear you get from raiding and takes much more effort to get.
OR
you already got the pvp gear you want.

all DHKs do is give you a scorecard to count how many people you have pissed off by killing there quest giver.

1 Like
23

Perhaps, but this isnā€™t ā€œClassic: But The Things We Didnā€™t Like Removed.ā€

2 Likes
24

there was a time in classic with honor and no DHKs so it would still be classic.

25

Was that time 1.12?

(I didnā€™t PvP much in Classic, I genuinely do not know)

26

So join an RP server.

27

they didnt say they are giving us 1.12 they said they are giving us classic.
they even said classic changed so they would have to make choices on which versions to take, specifically mentioning early versions of Strat and Scholo.

28

Why? We do not get battlegrounds in phase 1 but we are using patch 1.12 that had battlegrounds.

29

They specifically have stated multiple times that the reference model is 1.12 because itā€™s ā€œthe most complete version of our vision at that timeā€.

I have no issues if they donā€™t have DHK in the first phase, Iā€™m just saying that DHK are going to be part of Classic because it was part of Vanilla. Precisely how they choose to layer that is up in the air (theyā€™ve already revised the 4 phases to 6, so who knows).

30

Unarmored epic mounts were in 1.12, yet they are not going to be in classic.

There is a dismount function in classic for jumping off flight paths that never existed in vanilla.

So no, while the base is 1.12, it will not be ā€œtrueā€ 1.12.

31

I donā€™t think you could actually get the mounts, though. They existed, but I believe the armored versions replaced them as something you could acquire already.

32

https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/unarmored-mounts-megathread/173722

33

Did someone say unarmored mounts??

34

Itā€™s ā€œVanilla: but with things nobody asked forā€.

35

Letā€™s not derail the thread but you could trade and sell them. The vendor stopped selling them, but that didnā€™t remove them from the game and players could keep the old mounts.

The purpose of me saying it was it is an example of the game not actually being 1.12, but a modified version of it.

DKs did not accomplish its purpose of quelling players going around killing NPCs, it started the downward spiral of mass wpvp instead.

36

Youā€™re actually starting to make dishonorable kills sound fun lol. I canā€™t wait to see how many I can get now.

2 Likes
37

They should bring the original system in wich you were so hated that event your faction refused to help you, even npcs of your faction could attack you.

3 Likes
38

That sounds super fun too.

1 Like
39

I cared too much about them during Vanilla. Iā€™m going to revel in dishonorable kills this time around. I have NOTHING to lose by killing all the quest givers possible in STV or the like once Iā€™m 60.

Gonna be a blast

40

which is EXACTLY why they fail there intended purpose, if not actually making it worse.