#WarlockStables Compilation Thread

Bumping cause I support this!

1 Like

Omg I hope this comes to fruition

1 Like

This is something I want so bad I love having these extra side activities to do in the game that just immerses me even more into the world :smiley:

2 Likes

I’d love too. Please, support the other posts in general discussion that Baal linked at the beginning (the first two) :grin:

1 Like

This is something that I would be so utterly on board with. It would add some amazing customization to the Warlock Class. I wouldnt be opposed to a quest to unlock said grimoire in order to tame elite demons. The selection of demons has become rather stagnant.

2 Likes

check out the changes, will see what’s up

I’d love this so much. I hate most of the Legion remodels of my demons even though they’re higher res. If I could replace all my demons with TBC models I would do it in a heartbeat.

I’m sure plenty of people want to use some of the models they added in Legion too that we didn’t get to use.

Go bump the first two threads!

Bump as well.

However, here’s what I DON’T want - a microtransaction cosmetic system. The less & less cosmetic glyphs we see added, the more & more concerned I get that a microtransaction-based alternative is in the pipeline as glyphs are slowly phased out

Honestly having a grimoire of all the demons that warlocks can get and have customizations for our demons and have the grimoire be a side quest warlocks can do and each warlock grimoire is different because people can choose different options and pets and that way you can turn on and off green fire in the grimoire.

Now that would be awesome

5 Likes

Looks like Blizz won’t add this on SL so far, hopefully they’ll reconsider for future patches like with the green fire :l

1 Like

It would certainly fit the criteria as an evergreen system to be added for one of the .5 patches

2 Likes

Definitely support this… Bump

1 Like

bumping for the homie

1 Like

pero like bump the General Discussion thread too T.T

2 Likes

Bumpity bump bump. Let’s make this happen!

I should set an alarmclock to bumb this thread /excitedDemonScream

1 Like

Blizz please make it happen I want to go to Outland and the Broken Isles and tame demons <3

2 Likes

I’ve never seriously played lock, but I’m giving the class in general a long look for SL and for being one of the two iconic pet classes, warlock still has some real outdated mechanics around that identity still in place today.

Outside of sloth or just never making it a priority, I’m not sure why locks can’t “tame” (or maybe bind is a more lore-ific word for it) demons out in the world for different roles. Locks should have stable slots, with pets that align with similar Hunter categories of pet. It’d be cool to be able to “bind” a demon to a grimoire in some fashion and that represent that pet being “tamed”. It’s a big ask, but it’d also be a chance to introduce glyphs that convert a demon’s appearance to an undead appearance. In an expansion centered on the afterlife, that would be amazing!

I also think it’s way past time for warlocks to be getting a fire and forget pet heal. In an expansion pushing this unusually punishing 6 second summon cast, I think it’s only reasonable that the class be given a realistic set of tools to manage that pet. The message in that big cast time is clearly to make that pet a higher kill target and to force more pet management into the picture. They brought back the insta-summon button, so that’s a start but channeling a heal that costs health is some holdover classic crap. I really don’t feel more like a warlock channeling a heal. To compound the problem in it’s current design, it costs health in lieu of mana. I really feel that higher risk should impart a higher reward - and that doesn’t have to be in the form of a bigger fatter heal. It could clear snares or debuffs, or do something to increase damage temporarily - something that feels unique and warlocky.

2 Likes

Could you repost this in the first thread linked in the first post please? :slight_smile:

the thread in general discussion: