Dear rogues and mages

[Athamos-nemesis]

Are you so eager to be refuted again?

Context: hunter had 1% representation, covlol said pet survivability was more important than flat damage, blizz did buff pets, 7 days later hunters had exactly same players on the ladder… this change had literally NONE impact.

After blizzard buff hunters by 5% flat dmg, survival representation increased from 200 to 214 players in 3 days.

@Covlol-illidan

Survival got the damage buff, now our representation will go up to 6% right @Aeltis?

@Athamos-nemesis

@Covlol-illidan

However, if the pet dies we can not do any damage, so yes pet survivability is more important.

You already refuted and refuse to admit logic.

Pet buffs = 0 hunters
Dmg buff = +14 hunters

Get over with it. You are just a bad loser which insists to pet are more important than damage which is already proved wrong.

More players are winning through damage buffs than the pet buffs, what is so hard to understand?

I won’t answer your ad hominem points (i always knew you would ad hominem in the first moment you were able to look on armory)

I playing with my college friends and my real brother and i teaching them how to play, i’m not interesting in my own rating. You can just ignore arguments and points “yo ratin hahaha” anyway.