I mean I could take the same stance and say your shill is showing. Whether or not that this is the best expansion that they have done mounts is completely subjective. Which I 100% disagree. Your opinion is just that. An opinion. You can try and shove it in peoples faces as fact but that just makes you look arrogant.
Also you were the one who brought up the point about “going off to complain about something that matters” when you don’t even know what topics I post on or the stances I’ve made on certain subjects.
I’ve had people just like you who tell me that none of this matters go complain about something else in each thread. Which if you don’t want to deal with me, don’t respond. But don’t go and shill for Blizz and pretend that your opinion is fact.
"ESO also has a massive shop filled with power gain, cosmetics, boosts, and required things like character slots. It is not “ONLY” optional subscription.
Eq was in a very different time.
Also wow didnt, wow has had store mounts since vanilla
TCG mounts to be exact, those things made blizzard bloody rich. Then wotlk with the store mounts."
Thing is though I don’t view myself as a negative person (Not saying you are either). I’m just going to give it straight. For instance. I think Blizzards Art and Music team have done a fantastic job with BFAs zones and dungeons. But everything else in the gameplay department has been lackluster.
And greedy moves like this one is yet another reason why people have lost faith in Blizzard to produce quality products for their fans. A company that used to be games made by gamers for gamers.
Name another expansion that has produced mounts at a faster rate and in such a wide diversity.
From any, non-subjective measurable metric BfA has given us more mounts both reskins and new models. So no, it’s not an opinion.
You in here *****ing about all the amazing mounts we’re getting IN GAME because you mad that less than a handful end up in the store or cross promotion and you got reskinned horses instead of reskinned dinosaurs.
When it comes to mounts, “Quality” is subjective since it’s pure aesthetic (unless you’re some super nerd that can provide data comparing the number of moving parts or the complexity of the skeletal frames).
I won’t argue that you specifically might LIKE more mounts from an expansion over BfA but again, from any non-subjective measurable metric BfA has killed it on mounts.
I cant post links but here https:// tinyurl. com/mmochampiondeathwing
Remove the space after https and before com.
Also yes the model is new, its a new gryphon model, it is not a normal gryphon with a new texture, these are new models with nerw textures, they use the normal skeleton, but no its new models.
Lol… saying that it’s “my opinion” that BfA has produced more mounts than any other expansion is the same as saying that it’s an opinion that California is bigger than Rhode Island.
I think the problem here (it’s not really a problem but a perceived problem) is that the original store mounts and pets usually had a charity attached to them, thus making them “Okay” in the eyes of many players since clearly Blizzard was being 100% altruistic.
Now, in this case, the store mount is perceived as Blizzard being greedy because they are just putting a mount up for sale and have dropped the pretenses of a good cause.
Granted, in both situations Blizzard reaped the rewards of either taxes or profit, but your average Forum Dweller sees “Mount + Charity = A-OK” but “Mount - Charity = ActiBlizz being greedy monsters pushing aside morality for a quick buck from poor, poor fans”.