Sadly i can’t
however I can link you the overall performance of the spec in about 1 week, which implies all players instead of 2, 3 opinions.
are you a man of science?
He’s a man of using numbers he doesn’t understand, incorrectly. Dillon tried to explain it to him once but he went full Shey and just doubled down on being wrong.
4 Likes
I’m a guy who knows that authority is not a free ticket to say whatever nonsense you want, for this reason I resort to a general analysis through graphs and not an opinion that, in addition to being bias, has already been proven wrong.
Shay and Athalan team up
Nobody can stop them
2 Likes
Most intriguing. Has this produced positive results?
2 Likes
Well, blizzard did exactly what i asked for, i can call that as a very positive result.
This is true when you have enough knowledge to understand what is nonsense and what isn’t on the topic your speaking of. You do not unfortunately so you just look like a clown.
Ah ok very good to hear. I would also like to make you aware of the black swan metaphor which basically says if you can find one exception to the rule then it’s not a universal truth (all swans arwe white but you find 1 black one so not true). Essentially this means if you look at the ladder and see 1% sv hunter rep and conclude the spec is bad but cov gets glad with it and bicmex and dillon are r1 etc. then that disproves your theory. Have a good day.
3 Likes
to point out exactly what it took for sv hunter to go from 0.5% rep to 3%. After all, blizzard did exactly what I suggested on day 1 of shadowlands.
while what you pointed out took sv hunter from 0.4% to 0.5%. (pet survival changes)
I’ll repeat myself, your ok sv hunter means -1% spec rep.
Season will start, you will be proven wrong, again.
Blizzard will buff sv hunters proving what im asking for.
You will make again exactly the same excuse about sv being fine but not getting rep due to popularity. Mark my words. I’ll tag this comment.
It is though…
yes
we do agree here then
blizzard has given classes that should have heals, heals-- and big ones too.
The need for healers in the game has been marginalized because these classes that arent even hybrids, can self sustain.
Theres no trade off for a pure dps anymore.
Mages, warriors, and rogues have really good healing-- and to top that off, they have some of the best utility as well.
idk if your carrying enough fake certificates to take on mr. brazilian shapiro, exalter
might have to take a few more wikipedia classes
Now that I understand your political point of view, it all starts to make sense, imagine being leftist in 2022 
cringe incel response
i don’t align with a political party idiot
This is the twilight zone, I’m speaking to someone so dense he doesn’t understand it. Ignorance is bliss I guess.
2 Likes
2 years ago, covlol being against sv dmg buffs while spec had 0.4% representation.
I’ve already told you guys, if your wish is for your spec representation to be below 0.5%, you are talking to the right guy (covlol)
wtf ur a blade runner??
2s pet res change that made most people quit on top of the pet being made of paper initially into Ret/War, Tubro, and TSG queues that saw it dying passively.
Yeah imagine having to blow turtle to get your pet (how you generate focus to do any sort of damage) ressed.
Hmmm I wonder why survival representation was low. Hmmmm. Definitely a damage tuning issue. Not that people would kill your pet with cleave and it sucked getting it back up.
PS: this is also during the era of 2 button BM Hunter, then the spec was literally dumber than DH. Why would someone play survival when they could play BM for the same damage (good damage) with way less brain power involved. Why do you look at things in a vacuum and then get shocked you’re called a retard?
2 Likes
It was definitely a bad change.
It was the major problem? no
pet got buffed and it changed nothing (0 changes in a week) on the ladder.