Okay, they mentioned some of the staff here, but where did they talk about eradicating certain lifestyle cultures?
Everything is up to interpretation. Maybe take the context of discussion into account. I already stated that I speak objectively. And even stated that i could have been talking about my kid thinking they were a cat.
Your interpretation. Another person unable to speak objectively.
Objectively speaking. Thats what I am doing.
Just trying to speak in a way that you understand.
Thats part of objective dialog. I accept that prior to our convo. But its on you. Not me.
Same here.
Same for watermelon. I hate the natural one. But I can be a fiend for aritficial watermelon flavor candy. NGL, don’t trust me with watermelon jolly ranchers. Those would be gone minutes after you left them with me.
=
Sooo you’re trolling.
My interpretation is one thing. I asked you to speak straight to the point. This thing of, “well it could be… well it could not be…”
Get to your point. We are 300 + replies into this thread and a good chunk have been you.
Were you or weren’t you? Like, it’s cut and dry.
(side note idk where that random = at top came from)
I like sour apple but then again I’m a bear 
1 Like
Oh sour apple is good!
You mean fell apart because of the weak writing pushing a suddenly Punk Thrall and Vojin that turned for no reason other than to turn…
According to piss poor writing. Illidan murdered his guard for more power and kept murdering for more power. To stop the Legion. Arthas, did the SAME and the moment he became the Lich King, stopped the invasion of the Legion and made the undead stop attacking the lands of his people.
Same actions, different outcome. if anything Arthas was the truer hero. The Banshee Queen does it all to reveal the one behind everything and expose him. Another truer hero than Illidan.
1 Like
Uh? what? where?
No, i am talking about a topic objectively to utilize critical thinking and see things from different points of view, WITHOUT taking offense.
I clearly stated my intent is not to inflame, rather question things for better understanding and development on the subject. This also stemmed from the request for an unrelated example that got taken to be inflaming. Thats on them, not me.
My point is you should just go back to talking about honey.
At the time, the need for generality required the vague statement. Thats the reasoning.
And I’m the easter bunny. If you wanted to talk about a point utilizing critical thinking etc, you wouldn’t use the whole “vague” and “up to your interpretation” type comments.
That is best used for gathering information and or attempting to create bias when used in the wrong context. For a yes or no question, “up to your interpretation” works great. However, for open ended statements, it usually doesn’t work.
“could you tell me more?” usually works better.
Thing comes in this whole “vague” typing was done to purposefully create a rise because of how you worded it. Your kid could think they are a cat, ok cool. You wrote it in such a way that could have been done way better to try and ask what you were asking.
Oh I was going to that or the cat. He is on my lap. lol
Thing is you tried to use a statement that appears vague, but it’s not, and it’s created a giant mess due to how you, the asker, worded it.
BTW my job line I have to ask neutral based questions on a daily basis for data analytics.
1 Like
I’m asking myself.
Idk this whole thread devolved into something.
I like my cat. He is super cute. Going back to the OP of the thread though, I like the art style. It’s not so much cartoony but more so like “ps2 era” or “ps3 era” type graphics and they are fun.
2 Likes
I like it in morning oats as well.
1 Like
Oooh yeah true it is good in oat meal. I like putting it in smoothies if I’m sick along with ginger.
1 Like
Are you offended i used this in my argument as well?
For generality, yeah, one would.
Your interpretation. Not reflective of the intent. Thats an issue not an issme.
It was a generalized statement. Your interpretation is what is lending it to whatever offense you are experiencing.
I don’t see a giant mess. It’s just the forums.
You did?
Oh I’m not offended. Please clarify your statements. The vagueness makes it confusing.
Generality, you would use simple yes or no statements or open ended statements that are very clear cut.
So I see there’s some type of typo. So if that’s my interpretation, according to you which is your interpretation, what was your intent to start with? This way my interpretation matches what you’re asking.
I see forums as well but I see a thread that has 300 posts + in it when it probably could have been about 150. I digress.
Get to the point. Also, it’s bias to assume that I have offense or not have offense as well. If you are to remain true neutral, do not assume someone does or doesn’t have offense.
…wut?
You must be joking.
2 Likes
I always think that some bits of classic / wrath made the game darker.
Thadius for example… that character is SUPER dark in origin.
Sure did.
Objectively speaking, it WAS clear cut.
Likewise don’t assume intent in an objectivist conversation.