Major exaggeration
Should look up what complicit actually means.
Here: Blizz, Hong Kong, Freedom of speech, lets have an Adult discussion
It was literally right above your post, lol.
1 Like
thanks 
if above guess someone posted Dx and bumped it, literally looked and scrolled the general and didn’t see it before i made my post D:! prob overlooked or was bumped off the front 
1 Like
There is also the search option next time. If you didnt know there was one
i tried 
but yeah searching for anti-blizzard brings up quite a few results unrelated to the whole HK fiasco. since being anti-blizzard over every little thing they do (i.e. with each new patch and announcement) is quite popular on these forums it seems >.>
1 Like
We could only hope. Except we’d get more dumb threads about it to replace it. So I guess having the one is acceptable. 
I typed ‘‘hong’’ in the search box and it was the second option…
/shrug
But you’re directing your time and wallet powers at people who aren’t the threat. Edit: Maybe figure out the netizen vpn system and ask them how you can help?
Chinese kidnap squads and re-education centers were the thing Blizzard Taiwan staff feared. (Aside from the legitimate cover of company policy.) When you judge them for seeming to side with the Chinese regime, you presume it’s because they’re sympathizers or had a financial stake. I’m reasonably confident that Taiwanese are not terribly sympathetic to the Chinese regime and that if they had a financial stake, it would likely be secondary to the fear of ending up in a re-education center. Interestingly, aside from the Hong Kong protestors and Blitzchung’s defiance, the Taiwanese president did boldly declare that HK is a sign of China’s failure. It would be nice if I were wrong about people having reason to fear, but China has concentration camps, re-education camps, hundreds of millions of netizen dissidents. And Tiananmen Square in its history. I would love nothing more than to live in a world in which you were right and it was just greed, and I was wrong about the reasons to fear.
You work for the CCP don’t you? Do you get points towards your social credit score by pushing propaganda like this?
3 Likes
These merges always throw me off.
3 Likes
w/e you want to think.
Not what I think, it’s what was proven lol
Nah, he just doesn’t want to be sent to a concentration camp for re-education. Or could be he just believes everything Xi Xiping tells him.
4 Likes
I mean I know thats not true and you can literally not point to anything I misspoke on, but if you feel better asserting that as a flag plant and it somehow makes you a happier person, w/es
I love how the internet preserves things.
I got you playing dodgeball because you don’t know what you’re talking about.
- Dodge
- Duck
- Dip
- Dive
- Dodge
That’s all you can actually do.
I do what i can with what i have. I cannot take on China, i cannot influence its laws. What i can do is not support the business that i thought stood for certain things.
So you think it was done out of fear yes? Then J allen Brack goes on to say China had no influence. This would appear to be a lie. Just because a bully can kick the crap out of you doesn’t mean you cower to him everytime. eventually you have to stand up for yourself or be treated like dog meat the rest of your life. I’m not gonna fault the taiwan section they live in a different sphere of influence, but If Blizzard were to say the Taiwan decision wasn’t final and the final decision rests with US blizzard then Taiwans off the hook. There are so many better ways they could have gone about this.
2 Likes
So now its not me being ignorant, its just I dodged that one question (to which I fully offered to answer on another forum)
w/es
For Heaven sake, organ harvesting is a problem in India, but you don’t care about that, because you know…India is a democracy.
And the Chinese have made it very clear, that organ harvesting is a lie fabricated by the Falun Gong, so I don’t know who is telling the truth or who is lying, but if you are so concerned about organ harvesting, India is the biggest source of this crime against humanity that I’m aware of.
Umm, what?
You lost me there dude
Nobody’s saying they handled it well.
The first ban was a knee-jerk reaction too harsh and handed down too quickly fearing repercussions.
When they revoked it they tried to claim it wasn’t politically motivated (rubbish really but he’s a CEO and needs to put certain appeasement rubbish in his communique). They would have had a similar and potentially worse backlash if they’d openly admitted they were bowing to their Chinese interests.
To the point of believing they stood for something different; It’s an unfortunate truth that a publicly traded company must always make an informed financial decision and act solely on that. They are legally unable to act on morals.
2 Likes