So, you won’t answer the question.
We are not talking about WHY the US is supporting Saudi Arabia as that isn’t my point at all.
We are talking about the fact that America is currently supporting the human rights abuses being conducted on the Yemen people by Saudi Arabia.
Two different arguments.
Again, answer the question or concede.
You’re not showing my ignorance in anything because you keep dodging the question. You keep trying to change the subject to an entirely different one.
You think I’m unaware that the US is willing to cast aside its morals if it means it gets access to a region that is otherwise hostile to us? You realize that’s one of the reasons we are supporting Israel right? Why the US is willing to condone and turn a blind eye to the abuses done to the Palestinian people? If the US didn’t support Israel, we would lose a major ally and a foothold in the Middle East as we have relatively few friends in the region.
I’m completely aware of the WHY behind all of these situations.
What you keep trying to avoid acknowledging is that the US does in fact support nations and governments that violate human rights as this would contradict your statement from earlier where you argued, awfully, the opposite.
You attempt to crucify Blizzard for supposedly bending to the will of the PRC, when the victim in question knew Blizzard (not China) would punish him for what he did. Blitz took the argument from you before you even had it. He acknowledged he knew the rules, acknowledged that he willingly broke them and he accepted the punishment.
Then comes your false argument that Blizzard caved into the pressure of the PRC and that is why Blitz was punished, when Blitz’s own argument disproves this.
Yet you insisted. And were proven wrong.
I mean, I could literally do this all day my friend.
You are just another keyboard warrior with a trigger finger on Wikipedia trying to shovel information into your mind so you can regurgitate other people’s talking points because you have no real ones of your own. I’m very familiar with your kind and know that you’ll never actually acknowledge that you were wrong. You’re not capable of it because you’re so convinced, in the safety of your American home, glued to the computer chair, that you are right.
But to be right in a debate my friend, you need to prove it.
Which you haven’t done.
Your initial argument is disproven by Blitz.
Your next one was disproven by me.
Just concede and we can move on from this to more important issues.