Azerite twinks in non-BfA 110 bracket

PVP Battlegrounds
81

Always those people defending it, and making excuses even with evidence of these people talking about doing it, doing it, and people showing them doing it.

3 Likes
82

…what would they have to gain from spreading a fake exploit?

83

So, you saw someone in a bg doing 10x the damage or you saw something about this on xp-off as noted below?

Just trying to get the story straight.

84

They have their story straight, they even talked about the players ilvl. They did some investigation after seeing that players dmg, and after doing further digging found out how they have BFA gear in Legion BG queues.

1 Like
85

If they ban the lot of them like they did that exploiter back in wotlk then we prob find this forum very quite.

1 Like
86

Who are we banning now? Everyone who likes good gear or all the sockpuppets?

7 Likes
87

To be clear M Antorus drops gear that upgrades close to 270. It’s the necklace that will give them away.

88

The exploiters, namely the twink ones. Odd how no one in that thread over there said anything about not doing it and how it’s bad an exploit and to report people doing it. It’s almost as if twinks are 99% like that.

1 Like
89

Fuel for their argument here.

90

If they are exploiting then they deserve it, either way why defend it?

91

Why defend misinformation? Is this proven or just people saying stuff.

2 Likes
92

The post in question goes back over a month in March, and throughout April. Sorry, but no. Quit trying to save the twinks/exploiters. Quit plugging your ears and closing your eyes to evidence. It makes you look a LOT worse in future debates and that you truly, honestly cannot be trusted and are possibly an exploiter yourself.

4 Likes
93

What evidence?

94

So the accounts that have been there for years or months, with multiple twinks, are secretly only there to spread misinformation for “”“anti-twinks”"" on the official forums to latch on to?

Paranoia isn’t healthy.

2 Likes
95

Some anti twinks claimed to twink in the past so…

2 Likes
96

They’re anti-exploitation, you’re pushing them as anti-twink.

3 Likes
97

Because they are anti twinks.

4 Likes
98

This is entirely par for the course for them.

Still don’t think they’re secretly a twink/exploiter, but defending your friends can make you overlook a lot of things.

99

You referring to OP? Because they’re not really. They’re against the twinking method of getting into non-twink XP on bgs with their xp off through exploits.

100

So because they disagree with you on a matter you defend exploiters.

Ok

4 Likes