Your refusal to answer tells me all that I need to know. You don’t know what a logical fallacy is, and you’re now projecting what you’re doing onto me to deflect from the fact you just offered me an egregious example of one.
Except I’m not refusing to answer them. I’m asking you to clarify exactly what you need defined for you.
And you refuse to clarify what you need me to define for you. It’s another deflection method that everyone sees right through.
Yup, the big L of the game being designed exactly as I want it to be. What a devastating loss! faints I expected you to be better at this given your post count.
The PRO RDF trolls need to come up with better bait material, it’s like a broken record player with these guys spamming about alts. Much like if RDF is good or not, they don’t have ANY proof. SHOCKER!
Have you answered what you mean by talking or socialization? Is it just as simple as a small hi when the group is formed? Or is it having a conversation throughout the entire dungeon about a bunch of stuff that doesnt matter and you have no reason to know?
It is good, and there is plenty of proof for it. It gets people doing content that is out of date, allows people to play with better people (not to just get carried but inspired by other players but the anti-RDF people have no concept of inspiration) it allows you to play more of the game instead of sitting there waiting around to see if you will get chosen by the elitist arbiters for outdated content so they can get their 2 emblems 3 seconds faster.
What exactly does anti-RDF have? A bunch of toxicity, more prone to ninja loot since they can use master loot, “social interaction” which isnt happening with LFG, wasted time, ads for boosts, attitude that pushes people away and a guy that hops around on alts and never answers a question.
Which one do you think would be better for the game?
So then social interaction isnt killed by RDF since people meet the bare minimum of social interaction. Thanks for making the point that RDF doesnt kill social interaction, bring it in once Naxx is finished.
Nope, just calling it as I see it. You aren’t answering my question because you don’t know what a logical fallacy is. Your refusal to answer and your constant reliance on them is proof enough of that.
I mean the what the word socialization means. Since you seem to be struggling with that, I’ll help you out:
so·cial·i·za·tion
/ˌsōSHələˈzāSH(ə)n,ˌsōSHəˌlīˈzāSH(ə)n/
*noun*
1. 1.
the activity of mixing socially with others.
"socialization with students has helped her communication skills"
So playing with others is socialization which RDF does, so it by definition it doesnt kill socialization and all anti-RDF arguments are dead. So great, we agree wthat RDF should return.
It can mean a lot of things. Which is why I asked you what it means, to expand just beyond definitions. Which you refused to do multiple times and still refuse to do.