BLP:
- Best Lizard Performance?
- Bilingual Language Profile?
- Borrower’s Loan Protection?
- Best Lantern Placement?
- Better Local Politicians?
I don’t know, you’ve got me.
BLP:
I don’t know, you’ve got me.
Burning Legion Pepperoni
(bad luck protection)
This is some hardcore stockholm syndrome
“Bad luck protection”. An allegedly existing system wherein if you don’t get a drop, the chance increases by a set % and it adds more and more until you get it
It’s a myth. Never been confirmed by anybody at Blizzard.
Im sorry that you settle for less ![]()
I think for the event mounts there is an “increased” chance for the first encounter of the day, but as far as I know there isn’t BLP for those things. Just a higher than 1% drop chance.
I literally have no idea where people are getting “entitlement” from but I guess that’s what you get when you habitually eat paint chips.
Is Bad Luck Protection even mentioned anywhere in a Patch or Hot Fix note? If not, then it doesn’t exist. They say that the first drop of the day has a higher percentage of a drop. The drop percent is like 1%. They can make it 1.5% for the first drop of the day and that is higher. It isn’t really worth it to slave after these mounts. Just get a knockoff from the Trading Post and call it a day.
This is the best we have, stating there is an increase per day for the new mounts (Love Sweeper, Bomber, Horseman so far), while the old mounts are an increase chance on the first kill and low drop on every other kill per day.
It does not state the increase carries over year to year, it also does not state it doesn’t carry over so who knows.
yep.
the fact that there’s so little information, has created a game of (i probably can’t even say the name of the game due to ethnic reference) ![]()
…i think it may be called “telephone” in some places?
No official statement has been made, so people are just making stuff up.
That link I gave you is the official statement.
yes, I know.
and there is nothing in there which states anything about BLP, decaying/non decaying which is what I was originally questioning when someone made a statement which they were trying to pass off as factual: