Oh the irony! I keep thinking the same thing. The problem is that supreme rulers will not consider reason when choosing who in the populous is right. Their bias will favor those who agree with their current idea. The undoubtedly superior reasoning of 1.12 AV antagonists means nothing in the face of such favor.
How can justice prevail when the judges, who need to listen the most, are already convinced that they “know better” than any argument presented, even though the current situation is an indirect admittance that they surely do not?