Can’t add back something that never belonged.
The price of not putting effort/comitment, if you don’t want to do the dishes but you can pay someone to do it for you, you do it.
With that said, most of the LFR players are just going to complain and not take out the mount, another group is going to go normal and a minority with $ go to pay, and this group is the one that blizzard is interested in.
Theres that cognitive dissonance again. I have no respect for you with your lack of comprehension in this topic.
1 Like
So why does it matter if its LFR or not? You can use the same argument if it was normal or LFR
Wait. Theres players that subscribe to wow just for a single mount?
What do they do after vetting said mount? Unsub til the next…mount? Sit in Org is n their mount? Count their mounts?
Seems silly. Dont seem legir.
For the largest group of people, the one who doesn’t want to or can’t do that.
Okay. But wouldnt that same justification also be valid if the mount was even available at LFR?
Please, consider this theory.
- Fated is deemed too difficult for LFR at first so it’s excluded.
- Achievements are created, and since normal is the first difficulty, the achievement is tagged any difficulty.
- They go back on LFR and decides to open it cause otherwise you guys have literally nothing.
- They forget to update the achievements.
At which point was the cat supposed to be LFR?
It was never in LFR.
Lol
This manufactured outrage is already dying off.
No, the LFR people are only moving because they are being forced to do so, if the cat were in LFR none of them would go to normal or consider paying for it.
To say that LFR is not a difficulty is 
since it is a raid and it has a difficulty.
4 Likes
Now thats not true, what if those LFR queues are too long or you are running into groups that cant complete bosses.
What about the title? Isnt that something for collections as well?
In a world where LFR didn’t exist at first for that season, yeah. Did you actually read what I proposed?
Or you’d rather keep believing that Blizzard is some evil corporation that plays dirty?
They’ve pretty well established the truth that they are with the latest scandals, right? Not that they’re worse than any other corporate entity, which itself is merely the concentration of collective human desire as intensified by the most well-off subset of humanity…
2 Likes
are you suggesting that the LFR players are such a large community that they would self-collapse? 
depends on the collector 
but at the end of the day nobody has complained about the title, only about the mount so the preferences are clear.
The season is irrelevant to the players and the game as a whole and the LFR exists in the game and have a community so it must be taken into account.
Aren’t all big corporations? Or is it that they get money from being good people, respecting the law and high moral values? because from what I understand what they do the most is hide their scandals by hiding behind their money and their lawyers.
And Blizzard specifically has never done anything to keep a good looking, or the good will of most of its players. Have you already forgotten the scandals of last year and the migratory wave?
And that’s exactly why LFR was then included in the season. Unfortunately they forgot to update the achievement. You’ve never forgotten anything?
Oh! Poor multi-million dollar company, they forgot to update their information, surely they can’t pay anyone to keep an eye on these details to avoid misunderstandings and accidental false advertisements.
4 Likes
No false advertisement was engaged in, and no harm was done by an misunderstanding.
Yah man, the whooooole company was working on this super small filler season. It’s totally not just 2-3 interns put on this to keep us occupied.
They’re totally not scrambling to get ready for an expansion release in less than 4 months. No sire.
Legally, no, there has been no false announcement (I think, I’m not a lawyer), but datamining has been used as a strategy to generate hype for years now, among other things it can generate ge people subscribe in mass waiting for content.
Again, it is not illegal (I think, I’m not a lawyer) but it is dirty and immoral because it plays with basic human psychology by inciting behavior, just like lootboxes.