Do you trust that your friend got his money legit or not?
Still it’s not comparable.
And a so small chance of happening, it’s not a realist situation.
Yeah. If I was running say Vortex Pinnacle because I don’t have the mount from there, and it dropped and the guy didn’t want it I’d give them every bit of gold I have to get that mount.
Because this is clearly against the rules and has been against the rules for years.
I clearly do understand the definition of it. You can see the same definition on merriam. The quoted were because it was sourced, not because I made it up.
Maybe learn about the different meanings words have, and how sentences are structured to convey those meanings before you try to come at me for making up a definition that most certainly exists.
If he’s really your friend he would just give it to you btw.
You can makeup whatever situation you want. The issue is banning people who don’t know blue posts exist.
The issue is people dealing with a shady community.
3 Likes
No you wouldn’t. You’d press Need on the in-game icon and he would press greed or pass and you’d win the roll and not pay anyone anything.
New, don’t know any better
Wait, holup. Exactly what law are they breaking?
Tax evasion is the only thing I could possibly come up with, and they’d have to be breakin 10k for that to apply.
Give me link, please! xD
Ignorance is not an excuse
The real problem was that they were selling runs for real money and not including blizzard in a piece of the pie via WoW tokens and subsequently people buying runs with gold bought from blizzard.
The mafia needs their share or your protection will end.
If Blizz was really seriousness about the integrity of their game they would ban all types of carry purchases.
But that will never happen; Blizzard makes way too much money off of token sales that people use to buy carries. Money > game integrity.
1 Like
I think I would…Need? That doesn’t pop up anymore lol
Slave labor laws
There is nowhere in the original post that clarifies which definition of transaction it is.
'It is still a transaction if the goods are exchanged at one time, and the money at another. This is known as a two-part transaction: part one is giving the money, part two is receiving the goods. ’
Look, I’m not even saying that you’re wrong. You’re just being stubborn and refusing to admit that it is unclear because they used very broad wording including the word MAY take action and not WILL take action. Why is that so hard for you to admit?
give me that link! xD
mmk 
This is Starlights time TO TAKE OVER!!!
That’s how life work. If you deal with shady people that’s on you to find out before you get caugh with them. People that dealed with that community knew the risks.
1 Like