Not hung up on it, apologies for pointing at what supports my view?
Let alone, never did I claim there is a wide margin difference, that is your interpretation. I am stating there is a reason warriors are so much more preferred over other tanks.
How the utility which is being homogenized between classes affects the way tanks are viable. I also do not care about the past. This odd hang up that you and several others have over BDK being the best in the past needs to be let go. We get it BDK was the best, but that was then, this is now.
We arent in legion, we are in BFA.
As for who I play, that is an ad hominem because I make it my goal to have every single tank class, because I enjoy tanking. Hence, thenreasoning of my posts that states rather explicitly that the only true nerfs warrior really needs should be to damage and not in a dramatic way.
It is nice to see you are playing victim though.
@karmo: I could have sworn it was the massive ampunt of passive mitigation and active mitigation they possessed. The fact they are one of the best if not be dr t magic mitigstion tank. How their hige self healing ennles the healer to dps.
Grips are nice, but when grips are gone there is little else they possess. Their mobility is poor, hence the ranged interrupt but good positioning can let you yank mobs close.
Aoe slow is strong, but oh look, everyone has a form of cc.
Ranged intereupt? A warrior can just as easily, leap, pummel, charge and keep everything together.
A brez is nice, but noone is going “we need a guardian or a dk for the brez!”
When your utility can be substituted elsewhere, you base your comp on base necessities like damage and tankiness. Warrior has both, its getting nerfed.
Now the other tanks, especially bear, need buffs to bring them on par.
Ill give you control undead though, its pretty sexy.