You’re very entitled, aren’t you? They read the list, and “no sympathy” is the response. Be a better human next time.
You can be paranoid and assume they’re being dishonest all you want; it’s not in their best interest to unfairly ban people. You deserve it.
The “just asking questions” paranoid conspiracy crowd think they’re being clever. Generate a conspiracy and then put the onus on the rational people to “prove us wrong” like no, have your conspiracies and wait out your ban. Be a better human next time.
86 Likes
Oh I’m sorry, are you nervous we’ll see a problematic pattern?
39 Likes
It wouldn’t. I know it, you know it, he knows it.
Plus him posting a list of thousands slurs would be taken out of context in the micro-second he hit send because some people’s lifeline is internet drama.
15 Likes
OK.
Shut. Up.
Yall got dinged for breaking ToS/CoC.
People have been sharing screenshots of names they have seen, I know FOR A FACT you have seen them. No way you have not, if you know about the tweet.
ENOUGH.
Take your punishments like ADULTS. Stop whinging because CSAM references got people banned.
39 Likes
Porky, hog, fat ahh, double wide, butterball. Those sorts of things right?
3 Likes
Good little parrot, run along and get your crackers
16 Likes
Can any of you see that these types of responses only serve to prove Blizzard was right?
30 Likes
Right about what? We don’t know who was banned for what, because they won’t tell us.
7 Likes
They told us.
Those that were banned were actioned for names so beyond the pale, that removal from beta was the only outcome.
YALL KNOW THIS.
And then yall come here, just breaking the ToS/CoC with every post by spamming and insulting, then you WONDER WHY WE CALL YOU OUT.
Nah.
This is bonkers.
Yall know what yall did.
33 Likes
Holy entitlement Batman!
I would like to see your report card and credit rating first OP. Gotta determine if you have the right to make such requests.
7 Likes
Sounds like you want a list of approved words that can be used,
7 Likes
Making the list public would expose two truths at the same time.
Many people did in fact deserve bans
That certain mods running the moderation have clear bias on how they banned people.
Will we ever see this list? Absolutely not.
14 Likes
Considering you people enthusiastically support a ‘social credit’ system, that makes sense.
Since when is a request for transparency ‘entitlement’? It’s obvious to anyone with eyes you don’t want the list public because their team is clearly moderating in a specific direction and it would make you look bad. The fact you’re all so angry about the request is proof enough.
15 Likes
Can you see how you’re an overall negative to this community and your constant bootlicking and Karening proves Blizzards decision wrong?
12 Likes
Considering what has been inferred about the kind of names that got slapped, it’s hard to read these threads as anything but a desperate call for Blizzard to say every slur in an official statement.
4 Likes
What about “Free Lindsey”, technically not bad, but with recent events it could be considered bad by some, so truley its all subjective
2 Likes
Why would anybody need Blizzard to say them? I can think them a million times a day for free. We just want Blizzard to prove what their nasty CS agent is saying on Twitter while he insults the companies customers. If it’s not a lie (it is) then that would be easy.
3 Likes
Oh and for the record, all of you strawmanning me accusing me of being mad I was banned/renamed, I wasn’t. So, try again. If there’s nothing to hide, there’s nothing to worry about. If you don’t want to read that list of filth, I understand, but some of us don’t collapse into a sobbing mess on the floor when we read something that most would agree is awful.
5 Likes
Why would Blizzard care whether you agree with them or not?
5 Likes