AT vs RT is best idea

General Discussion
1

Now BN 4vs4 is dead, very cool :rofl:

1 Like
2

It would be less dead with them separated?

2 Likes
3

Not really care about that, but before AT vs RT, I used to use 10s-60s to find a game, but now I may use 10min but still cant find a game :rofl: And lots of well known player from leaderboard leave, good for me.

4

No, it would be more dead.

I think one thing people seem to be overlooking in this discussion is the impact of duos and trios.

Alongside full premades you can also now queue with 1 or 2 other people in 4s (or with 2 in 3s) and I think this itself has a far more significant impact on activity and queue times than just allowing full groups.

Now if they just fixed the issue with how MMRs are effectively reset every time you group with a different person… it really would be so much better. Unfortunately we have a few very vocal people here who insist that it’s “impossible” to balance this. “Impossible” is a word people use far too often.

2 Likes
5

Exactly!

Strange… because it’s exactly what you’re being sarcastic about.

3 Likes
6

It isn’t dead. It’s just once you get to a certain MMR(5200+ or so; feels like the game tiers it by 400 brackets) then you’re stuck with longer q’s. The ‘well known’ players all likely deal with the same problem. Unless you’re willing to purposely lose and tank MMR, be put in lower quality games consistently, then any very good player is stuck with longer q times.

Edit: I know you’re usually going 2:1, 3:1 in RT so more than likely your high MMR is why.

7

This is really just because the pros are playing on W3C and not battle.net.

8

No, w3c 4vs4 is also dead

9

Yep, queue times are definitely longer than before and a lot of players are disappointed.

10

queue times are not longer than before lol
And I don’t know anyone other than like three people on these forums who are “disappointed.” Most people are hardly noticing or caring.