If you’re gonna suggest some changes, and you’re an honest person, then you should justify and stand by the results of those changes.
Doing otherwise, isn’t honest.
It’s not detailed arguments it’s just buzzwords and “i’m better than you” talk
For a guy that complains a lot about buzzwords, he uses them… a lot
1 Like
THE RESULTS I SEE HAPPENING BASED ON WHAT I HAVE OBSERVED AND TESTED IN MY OWN EXPERINCE IS THAT… ya know what I think Im done here…
1 Like
You need to explain in scientific and mathematic terms why rush is better than dive. Please write a thesis otherwise you are just being intellectually dishonest and your opinion means nothing to me peasant
1 Like
Yup.
It’s like your whole routine.
Lots of words, no justifications.
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/NonAnswer
As much as I enjoy playing D.Va I can’t deny she’s a monster right now.
I can smoke 225hp heroes in the blink of an eye and there’s very little they can do if I really want them dead. They just blow up so fast. It feels good but I know it’s a bit too much.
I guess they’re reverting the micro missiles buff in the mid season patch, but I hope she gets to keep the weapon spread buff.
Explain in scientific terms why I’m intellectually dishonest by never abbreviating buzzwords while also tierlisting for high elo influencers. Then, your argument may hold some weight if you use basic algebra and professional game design interviews with world renowned game designers. I find it disrespectful that you would say such a thing. Your method is dishonest, and that is disrespectful
The Non-Answer is a response to a question that is so generic or vague that it’s not really an answer at all. Usually, not only is the answer very vague, it is very obvious as well. This may be because there is no better answer, or the askee simply doesn’t want to answer the question.
Although, you seem to specialize in describing methods in detail, than act like that is a justification for the end result.
When that’s just a detailed description of a method, WITHOUT the justification.
“This is a thing that is possible to do”
Is not the same as
“This is why you should do that thing”
And demanding that they are the same, is not honest.
Look at this non answer from GreyFalcon. You sent a whole paragraph. Super vague and unreasonable to expect people to understand what exactly you’re pointing to. How are we supposed to know what you’re trying to say?
Disappointing behaviour but I’ve come to expect non answers from you
That’s why you don’t take low ranks as a sample for balancing.
By asking for specific clarification.
I’m not like those people who refuse to give clarification.
More like lower ranked players don’t have enough braincells to pick zarya, rein, monke or pretty much anyone else 
Dva has to be the easiest tank to counter in this game.
Oh please. Don’t you know? Anyone but rein is allowed to be top pick. Anyone who isn’t rein is “OP”.
1 Like
Tbh, most of it is Sharpshooter mains complaining that Dive shouldn’t be keeping them in check.
There is no balance team; that’s been evident for 2 years.
1 Like
GreyFalcon doesn’t actually read anyone’s posts and just says random stuff that may or may not be relevant to anything. Sorry you had to find out the hard way.
2 Likes
Nah, I just take it morally and intellectually disgusting when somebody suggests a method, and demands that method gets used, but doesn’t attempt to justify it in a way that makes sence if you unravel the jargon into plain spoken English. And then apply industry standard Game Design techniques.
And if you ask for a concrete justification, they refuse. That’s bad.
If they refuse to give a concrete answer, and give a non-concrete justification or no justification at all, and act like merely describing a method is enough to justify it’s use.
That gets me questioning where their parents and teachers failed.
Because that type of behavior should have been trained out of them at a young age.
That’s completely unacceptable behavior for an honest adult.
That said, yeah, I do ignore a lot, from people who refuse to justify the “premise” of their logic.
As any honest adult should.
Because that’s how you disarm “loaded language”.
And refusing to allow “loaded language” to be disarmed, is morally identical to actively trying to deceive people.