Saying that the valk buff was a revert and not a buff while at the same time saying that 60>50 hps was a nerf instead of a revert can’t be an opinion. It’s objectively wrong and contradictory.
It would be the same as saying that the sky is purple or green, in my opinion.
this is the closest we’ve got to concrete data on the subject.
He got more than 2.5k responses. He also asked about who people mained… and regardless of who people mained, north of 60% of every demographic wanted either a revert or a rework.
Even if you don’t think this is “concrete” data… it is far more substantial than anything saying the opposite. That the majority wants Mercy to mostly stay how she is.
If they want to balance/offset this nerf with adding some ult charge for a successful rez, and/or with a slightly higher rate of ult charge from healing, I have no issue with that
The pistol has its uses, but in my opinion, as a healer, Mercy should gain ult charge at a greater rate from healing vs pistol use
She did just get buffed. Thing is we already had 60 HPS Valkyrie with a faster charge rate via base 60 HPS. It wasn’t good then, why on earth would it be good now?
We wouldn’t even be having this conversation without the specific half revert. This was not the only change they could of made. It feels intentionally done to undermine an already weak character. Not good.