What does “Balance for console” mean like this argument was so freaking easy to destroy I’m surprised it’s still being repeated… outside of Sym torb which hell even on PC low ranks still seem to dominate and get worse as you go up.
Mauga meta, Shared, Dva meta, Shared, Bap Ana Kiri meta shared, Sojourns dominanes, shared, Tracer meta shared, Sombra shared etc etc.
Some heros we just don’t play like Sigma is indeed strong on console He’s just not a console favorite, like we have our own “Good” heros and heros we prefer playing.
But like I kept hearing this absolutely dumb as hell “they dont balance for console” argument as if it had legitimately any meaning behind it, everything I heard was more of a round about way of saying they don’t balance for console “Well because PC has so many” that’s not the problem none of that has anything to do with why there isn’t console specific balance…
The answer is WHY THO? It’s not like there’s a “Fundemental” problem with the game that makes it completely unfun for console.
I don’t know what the hell happened in ow1 to make people think this sentence is anything more then a nothing sentence because people were soooooo quick to rely on the fact I was a console player instead of checking avaliable data on overbuff.
And its weird because the usual trend goes if there strong on console there much stronger on PC.
“They don’t balance around console” this sentence means nothing like it legitimately means nothing in the context of ow2 at least I don’t know what happened in 1 to have people to have such confidence in this statement but it’s legit nothing more then a incoherent sentence put together to “sound” intelligent.
If it’s an actual legitimate problem on Console not just a hero being “Good” it’s an actual legitimate problem on PC this has been true for the entire historh of ow2…
Console “specific” balancing is not a “necessity” and I legit have no idea where people got the idea it was/would be…