Edit: i dint read the text well before!, they dont allow it, but it just was so long it got me confused, but that doesnt change the original point of the thread
So? They kept it general to all third party platforms so that later apps like visor are also written down as against the rules. So that in stead of having to say [such and such] is not allowed every time a new one gets made, they already stated it.
They shouldn’t have to name each and every possible not-allowed program by name. They should only have to name the exceptions and everything else should just be considered not allowed by default until otherwise stated.
The fact that people somehow thought Visor was allowed through some magical loophole still astounds me.
Well, i still think its unwise of them to not adress examples of this, just so no one gets confused about it, checking some posts RN shows.people.now even more confused about other programs, just like i predicted
I mean there were some good reasons for why visor would be feasible,
I really can’t think of any. It’s exactly the same concept as something like aimbot. Just because it has less severe of an impact doesn’t mean it’s an exception to the rules.