What are you talking about??
You said that they didn’t require skill and now it’s a different kind of skill, sorry but no, you contradicted yourself don’t evade it.
So according to you he does require skill, just a different kind of “skill” therefore it is a competitive activity by your own definition.
I am talking about the example you gave about the athlete and the person without a leg which is a false equivalence because in OW there is a skill system that puts you against opponents of similar skill. Why do you keep trying to evade the subject being discussed by jumping to another thing that is unrelated everytime?
You said that in a competitive shooter you click enemies heads. SO by your own logic, moving around the map makes it a competitive game because you have to do it as well. I’m just using your own logic to explain it to you.
You ask if he shot something and he does.
He does shoot at enemies.
I mean, your arguments are terrible I’m just speaking in a language to can understand.
She has to aim it and click a button to use it in first person.
The answer is yes.
Started what, I’m talking about you using the argument of not everyone agreeing with the other guy, then you say it yourself. You are contradicting yourself.
You still haven’t admited that you are wrong about the game being competitive when I prove that it is with the literal definition of the word. Are you really that dense that you cannot admit that you are wrong about that?
Why don’t you prove that they did?
What is this supposed to do? Someone asking on reddit how many players are there? What is the point of that??
I repeat, according to who or what??