If you think deletebrig is what seagull should be getting behind then lol. People claiming there’s too much CC are better but are mainly just upset they should pick orisa or zarya in that situation instead of sticking to rein.
We need an eagle-eye perspective when we discuss these issues, or this game is soon going to have crows and vultures circling the game like a dead carcass. So let’s not stuff all our requirements into a pigeon hole but try to be open minded about change so the game will once more run smooth like a hummingbird humming away.
1 Like
A vocal minority agrees with, and it sticks to the devs. I think things should be changed because it makes sense, not because a bunch of salty people chant in unison.
An guess what, sometimes everyone else isn’t going to agree with you which means YOU are the vocal minorty
1 Like
Critical thinking and caring about truth are almost always in the minority, that doesn’t say much about me though, more the rest of you.
I am right and everyone else is wrong , In not an argument my friends.
Different people value different things from the game. So no one can be the absolute truth the game needs to be guided to what most people think is best.
3 Likes
Certain things are objectively measurable, opinions isn’t one of them.
From a rational pov, Seagull’s opinions are full of self interest and holes and it’s already been shown his followers aren’t being critical thinkers.
She indirectly counters her own counter. On paper pharah should be her true counter. But since the only way to kill brig is burst damage, you need to use burst heroes. Since heroes such as hitscan were made useless outside widow, they buffed them now nerfing her one true counter. Brig has made this game into a crazy armor mess. Where her best counter is doom. A lot of us have just had to bite the bullet and deal with it. But now it’s the brig players turn to move on and deal with it. She can still operate in Her armor niche. You’re still a strong tank/support hybrid. You’re just losing the dps/tank/support hybrid. Thank the lord for that.
Unless that is what you WANT from the game. Good lord man.
Some people want to be able to outplay their enemy not just get hard countered.
For example if your Hero hard counters my hero so I can’t play it. Then I want a hero that hard counters my counter so I can force them off that hero.
Now the game isn’t about skill it about who picked what hero and that is stupid for a lot of people. Those are the people who agree with him.
While there is also another group of people who the game to be less about hard skill and more about picking the right hero. Those people won’t agree.
It comes down to which side has more people at the end of the day. Neither group is right or wrong they just want different things
3 Likes
The developers have never really cared about the casual market of Overwatch, they’re just there to leech money out of from the loot boxes. The real runners are the pros and E-sports, they have all the saying towards what changes the developers are doing to the game.
1 Like
That isn’t true.
If they didn’t care about casuals Mercy and Winston wouldn’t exist
1 Like
I don’t play brig that much, tbh. I main widowmaker. You can still run tracer vs her with winston, as he counteracts the aoe healing and armor. It’s not optimal but synergy still exists and avoiding a melee range character as tracer is stupid easy. The denial comes from area denial and the aoe healing + armor. But using winston + tracer can still work if they have a brig. I don’t know how to feel about brig’s shield change itself, I feel like she might go dumpster tier b/c she’s already only 4th picked. I don’t think people’s perceptions of her match up well to reality at all.
This is funny to me as so many people try to tell you switching is everything and the game is RPS, then try to tell you at the same time it’s not and there’s always counter play except for some new additions to the roster. Imo there is counterplay and even with the new roster though maybe it could be toned down a bit to allow a bit more nerfing ults across the board is a terrible idea and totally ignores how ults are gained in the first place.
That’s a false dichotomy, there’s way more than those two options it’s not an either/or situation. Right now OW does already strike a balance, some hero’s are great vs others, but for the most part, there’s not a lot of bad matchups and that’s good. But talking matchups is bad in itself because it’s not a 1v1 game it’s 6v6.
I want individual skill to shine in fights and more freedom to pick the hero I want.
Please explain how Segualls ideas are bad for me with your superior critical thinking skills?
3 Likes
Never claimed he should support #deletebrig, you however attempted to claim the community’s outcry for her nerf meant very little in Blizzards decision.
1 Like
I’ll ignore the sarcasm, building ult takes skill. Using ult takes skill. Avoiding ults takes skill. No part of that equation removes skill. Counterplay already exists. In some matchups if it were 1v1, that counterplay is more limited, such as doomfist ulting Ana. But if he’s always solo ulting an Ana that isn’t exactly the best use of his ult either and you can do things like get Zarya on your team to bubble her. It’s a team game.
So you just ignore the question. I said how would the changes not make it better for me.
I don’t consider pressing Q that much skill to me the duel is more fun
1 Like
It’s Pro-fever again
If a pro says it it’s must be true right?
I have no doubt they are huge factors in OW decisions
1 Like
By not making it worse, which is what his changes tend to do. Or did you like it that mercy was ruined along with the meta for a year? Before she was a slightly under tuned hero not used much in top ranks. Now she’s dominated the meta and been nerfed so much she’s worse than where she started. All to fix a problem that was manufactured as being a real problem.
1 Like
You not answering the question cause you can’t. This is why lots of people agree with seagull
1 Like
I answered it you just don’t want to admit lol