As I see it, although the above is stated as if it were a fact, I see it as an opinion.
I respectfully disagree with the opinion
In my opinion, if a character is played in a professional match with professional-level stakes, that character is viable
Factually, Mercy is played in such matches
As I understand it, a professional player will play what he or she is told to play in exchange for professional-level compensation, regardless of whether it is the character they want to play
As I see it, tho the above is stated as fact, I see this as opinion
I respectfully disagree with the opinion
If it were a fact that Mercy was underpowered, it is my belief that she would not see any play at all at high levels, including but not limited to pro matches
I think I’ll quote two posts that sum up the lack of thought behind this statement:
We know that it’s a good enough of a foundation to get a hero reworked. Did you know that Mercy’s rework was caused in part because “Resurrect wasn’t fun to play against”?
Oh, I back them up… just not in this thread. You’ll need to go here for that:
For statements that are in the realm of pure fact, like “Mercy is classified as a Support”, this is true. Your example, as I see it, falls into this category.
For statements that are subjective, such as “Mercy is overpowered”, disagreements can occur based on personal judgement. Your example, as I see it, does not fall into this category.
I don’t see how it’s not. If use at all is not underpowered, then how is constant use not overpowered? Was Mercy 2.0 on launch fine? Was it never in need of nerfs because other heroes were also used?
Disagreements can also occur based upon personal judgement in the example I provided.
And in both the example and in the topic we are discussing, one side is objectively wrong.
Now, if Mercy’s pickrate were closer to that which might be considered “balanced”, it would be more up to perception… but anyone with an objective viewpoint can see that a hero having 15 times the pickrate of one of their counterparts in the tier where viability is most isolated from other factors contributing to pickrate is not balanced.
You unable to comprehend my post and accept it as true =/= lacking thought
Simply re-quoting posts I am not talking about and I don’t care about = lacking thought.
Par for the course with you, though.
The leap of logic you and many other players make is that this now a reason to do anything forever. It’s not. And you’re being willfully ignorant if you honestly believe that is the only reason she was changed.
No, you don’t back them up. I’ve seen your propaganda piece before and It’s not nearly as compelling as you wish it was, sorry.
“a lot of reading” lol. The only reason it is “a lot” is because it is intentionally bloated.
Oooooohh… The Hook 1.0 crap… oh god… how we hate that, the worst was how people tried to defend that crap. this was one of the worst things ever in OW.
I mean, if meta is the cause for change, then the whole of those not in goats would be changed or those only in goats . Mercy, I think. Should always be picked lower than ana and Moira due to the skill ceiling. But she should be higher than now since she is one of three supposed primary healers. Her pick should be because her player is a god with her, not because she’s OP or to be a rez bot. (In higher play)