The whole point is that there isn’t anything concrete. I’m not necessarily denying the possibility, but the evidence that’s being shown is wishy washy at best. This kid thinks that just because Activision patented something, it has to be in Overwatch 100%. If you ask for details, he deflects and avoids the question.
I found multiple patents.
I found a single screenshot.
I literally asked you for j_your version_ of the dev statements multiple times?
And I still can’t find anything on USIPO.
I’m still giving you a massive opening to show your point. I don’t know what you’re talking about when you bring up USIPO and Overwatch is and literally nothing I do is bringing anything relevant up. I just keep getting spelling corrections for USPTO or brought to things like the song Usipo. I am willing to admit that. But you still won’t share. You even said that you have a direct link to it, but just can’t figure in how to pass the spam filters you’ve already passed twice.
My point is its obvious you’re talking out of your rear. The outcome this conversation is irrelevant, you literally don’t know what you’re even saying, just bringing up words that sound fancy but you can’t back up.
I asked specifically where!
As in point me to it.
Again, I don’t see anything in 6 of these patents.
Okay cool.
This still doesn’t prove WHERE they are being used.
And I never once denied this. I am well aware of what kind of company Activision is overall.
What I’m asking for is evidence of those threats being in Overwatch. Each time I do you change your story and move your own goal posts.
You literally have nothing, and its starting to show.
It doesn’t tamper with lobbies though.
Just so we’re clear, I strictly believe that if it’s in Overwatch, the patent would be regarding the endorsement system.
This is from the thread that YOU linked as “evidence”:
In other words, it is irrelevant to this conversation.
That said
I’m looking at the list of citations right now. No where is Overwatch properly cited.
A picture example is not a proper citation.
Either way, it doesn’t matter. Like I said it doesn’t influence matchmaking, and is the only one that has anything remotely referencing Overwatch.
Remember, this is the list you presented:
For our purposes US20190091581A1 is a repeat of US10561945B2 (both are the endorsement patents, which I marked for clarity) and its redundant to bring either up again, especially since they are ultimately irrelevant to matchmaking.
As for the other 5?
Absolutely none of these shown anything directly specific to Overwatch. And using 1 to relate the other 5 is a massive leap in faulty logic.
Again, you are more than welcome to directly prove me wrong, just show me exactly where in each patent you’re talking about. But I have no doubt that you’ll just fall back on to your classic “iTs ThErE!!!11!!1!” without any context because you don’t know how to form an actually coherent argment.
That’s not how it works mate.
The outcome in question is the outcome of the match. The setup process is not an outcome. You’re literally complaining that both sides get a fair game.
If they influenced the actual game to level the playing field, then you may have a point, but you seem to have moved away from the DDA argument you also used to relentlessly repeat.
Oh so now I’m important enough to show to an entire legal team?
I’m honored, truly.
Glad to know just how big of a fantasy you seem to have built for yourself.
Ultimately it’s gotten clear that you have absolutely no idea what you’re presenting and are just repeating whatever rhetoric your favorite youtuber or streamer tossed out to you a while back. As entertaining as it is to watch the record actively break and go on repeat whenever their initial argument doesn’t follow through, I think we’re probably done here.
If you actually have any of the evidence you say you have, you are more than welcome to share and I’d probably be willing to take this somewhat seriously. I’m not opposed to the idea of rigging or against having a proper conversation about it. But I’ve given you more than enough openings to simply show what you mean, all of which you’ve failed miserably. So for now, good luck with your… ah… case…? I’m sure you’ll need it.
Remember, you have about a year until OW2 comes out, so I hope you find literally anything concrete by then!