I think Blizzard would be perfectly fine to lose the less than 1% of the playerbase that thinks like you, if they get more players in return.
Weird concept that videogames are supposed to fun.
only because they know were smart enough not to throw money at a flagrant cash grab, thats been in a state of rapid decline since launch
Why not just be honest⌠you cant hit shots with snipers and your jealous of those who can⌠and lack the ability to out play themâŚ
The only weird concept is your inability that not everyone derives fun from video games in the same wayâŚ
Some like competition, ever stopped to consider that? Unlikely lol⌠because your the only gamer out there and every game needs to fit your definition of funâŚ
Pretty self centered attitudeâŚ
So if I challenged you to slam your head against a wall a 100 times for $5, you would find that immediately enjoyable, merely because itâs difficult yet achievable for you to do it?
Or does the quality of the gameplay interaction actually matter?
Ah yes, the typical derail attempt to attempt to avoid losing a debate you just realized you cant winâŚ
Its clear to me your just in denial that you and the game are a bad fit for each otherâŚ
2 Likes
Derail? Nah, Iâm just pointing out how absurd it is to claim that the only thing that matters in gameplay is whether itâs difficult yet achievable.
Which is what youâd expect from somebody who doesnât even know the basics of gameplay design.
Yep and your still refusing to acknowledge the simple fact that not all gamers get fun out of games in the same wayâŚ
Which invalidates your entire argument 
Itâs his typical method everything he is spouting at you get did a year back and i refuted everything with hard facts he will not answer them and continue diverting the topic.
Itâs a shame he is smart and manipulating but not using it for making the game better but using it to market himself as a analyser so that blizzard may notice while having not a ounce of gamer dna.
The sad thing is he decided due to his lack of gamer dna to attack the fps core community.
Which will make all his efforts to get noticed to go in vain.
Maybe if he starts playing the game again more and make actual posts maybe but i think he is long lost.
1 Like
Yea i was begining to question if they were just baiting for attention myselfâŚ
I mean they said some pretty hateful things trying to get a rise out of me lol
So thankful we cant filter others lol
2 Likes
Oh, I recognize that players like you exist.
I just donât think thereâs enough of them to matter to Blizzardâs financials, if they all quit.
Oh you mean smart people? Yea this a smart personâs game after all 
Itâs an interesting idea but it sounds awful to actually play.
Burst and oneshots are so good right now because they are the only counters to sustain.
Another problem with this idea is that it would even further encourage mistakes and reactive gameplay instead of pro active game play.
One shots very much do interact with other aspects of the game such as positioning, awareness, cover usage, movement, etc.
I mean, that deliberately causing the game to be less fun for the vast majority of its playerbase, is a gigantic financial waste.
And if you think causing Blizzard to lose tens of millions of dollars is smart.
Then feel free to go be smart somewhere else.
Ya so financially bad that he has had a event skin as cupid and Mythic sale already, not to mention widow cooking shop sales.
This is why you need to play the game and be in reality and not use boom knowledge.
These heroes are a matter of fps elitism you hurt them you hurt your core, without a core you wonât survive and lose more income.
Apart from you, your alt accounts with low posts and 20 others who I can name others know snipers are part of the game
Widow is not even a problem at anywhere below gm and even there in two or three maps with pockets.
Your average casual player loves playing widow even if he has no skill to do in comp and despite a sombra rework that hard counters them in qp.
Thatâs how popular sniping is.
Stop talking about things you canât understand.
1 Like
I think Iâd rather focus on industry professionals who have defined the entire competitive gaming industry, over your âexpertiseâ on the subject.
Guys i will cook the best pizza in the world by watching kitchen nightmares , you all eating the pizza from my shop donât know what you are talking about 
LmfaoâŚ
How am i ruining your fun? By being better at a pvp focused game than youâŚ
I really hope your trolling⌠because if your not, my lord do you have issues
2 Likes
âfunâ is subjective and stop making up crowds that agree with your point (not a majority at all).
Also this is not a Sales product, is a Videogame, a first person shooter so if you are triggered by Snipers existing in FPS, you picked the wrong game mate.
Yeah, and they agree Snipers do belong in FPS. You are alone on this one my guy.
Dislike Snipers/One shots? Try a MOBA instead but spoiler alert: There are some one shots there too so âŚ
^
While the game would be better without one shots, i dont think making them into dots would be a viable change.
it kinda was, the thing is, it showed that it is a flawed concept. If you hit the headshot, the enemy would die regardless if a healer was not in reach. Dying to DoT feels very bad e.g. Dynamite. if a healer was near, he could very easily out heal the DoT. But than there is another issue: Widows Skill floor and cealing would collapse. It was easier to just do Bodyshots and you killed the enemy faster than with the dot.
If the dot rate would be increased to make headshoting viable again, healer could not outheal and the target would die regardless, making the DoT redundant because the result would be the same as without DoT
its also a deathsentence with Projectiles. Jumping locks you in a Animation making predicting you very easy. making every hitscan Projectile would change nothing. If you jump constantly, that a skillissue on your side.
The hanzo changes would not change much to be honest. Sure you wont get one tapped after 40meters but hanzo thrives at medium to close range anyway. This change wouldnât change a thing apart from getting randomly killed across the map. As for the storm arrow changes, I think that would honestly break him. When I play hanzo, itâs not impossible for me to land 2-3 headshots back to back on regular players. Considering I also have 1700 hours on the hero alone, I know how to consistently land at least 4 out of 5 arrows back to back on tanks. Thats a whole lot of damage on tanks which I feel would suck for everyone. The casual joe would probably be useless but a real hanzo player is gonna decimate you and your tanks. Trust me, you donât want that.
As for the widow change, itâs interesting but idk if you really want a widow constantly able to easily escape her divers. Her hook breaking could counter that but what happens when shes not getting dived, are you really ready for a hitscan one shot hero constantly killing you from any angle on the map? Just FYI I speak from a GM standpoint, I speak from a level where everyone is consistent and never miss shots.