did you make a typo in the title or something op
I’d imagine as the ranks get higher, the population gets smaller, and personally (mere opinion mind you, can’t confirm!) I think the algorithm does favor queue times above the ratings. There’s a soft line and a hard line with the exceptions it will and won’t make for the sake of expedience.
Yea, but adding to the game lock that you can play only with people one rank up or under yours, and not with bouth groups at once, would fix many problems. Including the abuse of system we had in past, when high rank players played game in time when there was not many people and stomp on noobs.
1 Like
Yeah the over exaggeration is real. Unless you have real proof of that, no one is going to believe it. The hashtag is strong on this one
#StopOverexaggerationwatch
1 Like
Lets say one game takes 5 minutes and you get in the next one without any waiting time
This means you can play 12 rounds in 1 hour
So you are saying since yesterday you played 25h non-stop.
Seems legit
2 Likes
I think I said this on the last thread you made, but I’m pretty sure even active throwers have winrates somewhere in the 33% range.
But hey, you seem to have gone down from 600 to 300. 
2 Likes
I don’t know if I’m more disappointed in this thread…or the fact that someone else beat me to the reply I wanted to make
Hey OP since this is a super serious thread I’ll give you a super serious answer…play MH…you will statistically win just because of rng around half the time…so you’d have 150 wins during those 25 hrs you played nonstop!!!
1 Like
How would the matchmaker always be “rigged” against you?