Is Widowmaker the hottest hero in the OW universe?

but again the devs never confirmed she wears nail polish. and there’s isn’t anything to suggest she hasn’t been explosed to radiation ever in her life.
alot of things in overwatch have been assumed because of context clues.
Alot of people assumed that mercy has something to do with reaper’s transformation. because of her rez ability, and the interaction “Mercy: What happened to you. Reaper: you tell me doc” but that ended up being false because moira was the one responsible.
alot of people thought dva was a starcraft pro because she was advertised that way (including jeff calling her one in an interview) but micheal chu later said “thats a misconception”

So if all of that was false despite their being context clues, then there’s nothing to suggest ashe wears nail polish until the devs comfirm. so you say “ashe wears nail polish!” like its a fact is wrong. your lying

There is no evidence to suggest she has been irradiated. This is not something the vast majority of people experience. She is presumed not irradiated until there is evidence to suggest otherwise.

It has been explicitly stated that Hog does suffer from radiation side effects because he lives in an irradiated wasteland

ok tell me where the devs have said she was never exposed to radiation.
and also again there were many context clues that mercy experimented on reaper and that dva was a starcraft pro (including jeff kaplan saying she was) but that all ended up being false. so if that was false then why should ashe wearing nail polish (something that a dev never comfrimed) also not be false

Those were assumed true until there was evidence to the contrary. How are you not getting that? Am I being punked?

1 Like

ok the fans assumed something was true until the devs said it wasn;t. meaning it wasn’t true. just because the fans thought it was true doesn’t mean it was! just because you think ashe paints her nails doesn’t mean its true!

How am i getting what? that the fans are wrong some times and we should wait for the devs to comfirm its true before assuming ashe paints her nails when NONE of the devs has said that?

i mean if the idea of fans being wrong is funny to you then yeah?

“THE FANS THOUGHT IT WAS TRUE SO IT WAS TRUE” thats your logic. and no just because the fans thinks something is true doesn’t mean it isn’t wrong

1 Like

How are you not getting the difference between things that have evidence and things that do not?

D.va being a starcraft pro had ton of evidence (including jeff kaplan himself mentioning her being one). but micheal chu said it was a “misconception” meaning all the fans were wrong and that it was never suppose to be true(meaning that even jeff was wrong)
. so until a dev actually comfirms that ashe’s paints her nails your just making things up

Right. So the most reasonable thing to was to assume that it was true until a dev said otherwise. Nobody came even close to even remotely implying the fans are always right.

The most reasonable course of action is to believe the most logical conclusion based off the evidence you have, until a dev states otherwise.

What do you not get about that?

JEff kaplan the director of overwatch called dva “a starcraft pro” in an interview but micheal chu said that it was a misconcpetion. meaning it was NEVER true, meaning the fans were wrong. meaning it was wrong even before micheal said it was.

what your saying is “ashe painting her nails is true until a dev says it isn’t” but its not . ashe painting her nails is a theory until proven canon.

If micheal chu says “ashe doesn’t paint her nails” that doesn’t mean “it was true until he said it wasn’t” it means “it was never true in the first place”

if someone thought “the earth was flat” and someone who knew about the earth told them it wasn’t, that doesn’t mean “the earth was flat, until they said it wasn’t” it means “the earth was never flat and they were just wrong”. do you not get that? people used to think the earth was flat along time ago until they were proven wrong. that doesn’t mean “the earth used to be flat but now it isn’t” it means “it was never flat in the first place”

If your issue was one of semantics, then you should have said that instead of posting dumb stuff like this:

Waste her time 2018

if a devs confirms that ashe doesn’t wear nail polish then it doesn’t mean “it was true until the devs said it wasn’t” it means “you were always wrong”
so until a dev confirms either way there’s no reason to believe you.

There is reason to believe it. The evidence points to it. You can be wrong, but that doesn’t mean you were wrong to believe it with the information you had available at the time. Believing Jeff Kaplan was not the wrong course of action, it was the most logical thing to do at the time.

And again, that is a semantical point. I’m not going to debate semantics. You knew exactly what was meant, you were playing dumb because you don’t want to admit that people thinking Roadhog’s nails are gross is reasonable.

she has black nails. thats it. there’s no evidence to suggest its nail polish besides “its never been said she’s been explosed to radiation, and she doesn’t look dirty” but there’s nothing to say she’s never been exposed to radiation or she just doesn’t clean her nails. Until the devs confirm it then its not canon. it just a headcanon or theory. it hasn;t been said she’s been exposed to radiation but its never been said she wears nail polish. your only evidence is “but the devs never said ____”

but ashe having the exact same looking nails isn’t gross. k fam.

Which why I said “most likely” and “until devs state otherwise,” which you also argued against for some weird reason that even you obviously don’t buy.

Because the evidence points to it being radiation poisoning and not nail polish. The same is not true for Ashe. The evidence for her points to nail polish.

ok besides “the devs never said she wasn’t exposed to radiation and she doesn’t look dirty” thats not evidence those are assumptions. “the devs not saying something” isn’t evidence. the devs not saying she was exposed to radiations doesn’t mean she wasn;t. thats just something your assuming.

if you didn’t know anything about ashe or roadhog and you just looked at their nails you would assume the were both painted. but roadhog’s nails are gross while ashe’s aren’t despite them never being said to be nail polish.

so its not canon. the only reason people would find roadhog’s nails gross and not ashe’s is because of assumptions in their head that could be completely wrong.

America is not stated as Irradiated. A place being that irradiated is exceptionally, incredibly rare. The people from America are also exhibit NONE of the symptoms that the Junkers display. And unlike the Junkers, not all of the heros have those nails.

There is a total and complete lack of evidence for that, so the most reasonable course of action is to assume it isn’t there is evidence to suggest otherwise.

But that is not the state we find outselves in. The state we find ourselves in is that we are explicitly told Roadhog’s nails are NOT nail polish, and that he is suffering negative health problems from radiation exposure. We have zero reason to belive that about Ashe.

The reason that people would find it different is that the currently available evidence points to it being different.

that doesn’t mean they’re isn’t radiation anywhere else in the world, its still possible ashe somehow was exposed to radiation, possibly robbing a place that had radiation. also the junker queen doesn’t seem to have black nails on her poster or wrecking balls sprays, and in wasted land there are plenty of junkers who gave normal nails, so not everyone has had the same effects from the radiations. its possible that ashe was exposed to radiation for a short time and only ended up with black nails.

again nothing confirmed about ashe. (we still have zero reasons behind her painting her nails) and even if ashe painted her nails and roadhog didn’t that doesn’t mean roadhog’s nails are uglier, they look exactly the same. the concept may seem weird, but widowmaker has her heartbeat slowed then she doesn’t feel the cold and turned blue. realistically she would look terrifying, but in the game it doesn’t look weird. she just looks blue. just because the reason behind her look might be creepy doesn’t mean it actually is. just because roadhog’s nails are black from radiation doesn’t make him ugly. Widowmaker being blue due to a low heart rate doesn’t make her ugly.

there isn’t any evidence besides your assumptions of the overwatch world. even if it isn’t radiation there’s plenty of reasons for her nails to be black besides paining nails. it could be dirt or blood, or heck if look her at her origin story her nails appeared to always be black, it could possibly be a birth deffect. yeah it sounds weird but its just as a valid theory as “she paints her nails” because until a dev says otherwise there’s not a comfirmed reason her nails are black

*Whispers to the rest of the community *
(In a David Attenborough voice) And here we see the wild forum posters in their unnatural habitat. Let’s watch as they display their grandest wits and minds to impress their fellow community. It’s mating season for this species when waifu’s are on this species’ minds. And we are in luck, this could be the longest duel battle in Overwatch forum history (100th post in this thread!)
The wonders of Overwatch waifu hotness… it’s serious business!

*Passes the popcorn *

https://i.ibb.co/pwX2dZT/dvapopcorn.png

4 Likes