The only way your idea works is if he has an ulterior motive and uses a definition of main that he has not only never used,
… or if he made a mistake, which he could easily, being a human being and being prone to human error.
but is paid to know better to use,
I highly doubt knowing what a main is is in his contract, particularly since its not exactly a standardised term. And either way, he is still vulnerable to human error as Jeff is, once again, a human being (see above). There is no amount of money you can pay someone to not ever make a mistake.
Your paranoia about the job title has you in denial about his statement. Simple as that. That’s why your the only one interpreting it that way
Everyone knows Symmetra is a highly unpopular character, and there’s no reason that shouldnt extend to the dev team too, and that only a minority would actually like her enough to consider themselves Sym mains. The dev team is also rather small compared to the size of the player base, so it’s quite possible not even a single person on it likes her enough to consider themself a main. This is why the question was asked in the first place. So if you want to call me paranoid, you’re also tarring those same Sym players that asked the question wit the same brush.
Jeff could have dispelled this by replying to that question with a simple yes.
But he didn’t. He instead gave a vague answer that merely implies the potential existence of a Sym main on the dev team, which is why I am asking for him to directly say yes or no after having read the definition of a main I gave in the first post, because as we can both agree a paid playtester (which is the only example he can seem to think of) does not a main make.
Again, if I truly am wrong, then someone from the dev team (such as the person who is allegedly a Sym main) should have no problem ending this right here and now.