OP also created this thread which links to the poll regarding Quicker Play.
Roughly 30 liked it, 70% didn’t.
2 Likes
That’s a straw man…
You supported a claim that wasn’t stated as an opinion but rather concrete fact.
I am saying that to say “this is concrete fact” you need more than “I think/feel this is the case”.
What other good methodology would you propose other than using good and valid evidence? The methodology that would necessarily lead one to the truth!
I don’t care what you think about it… Bottom line is it is the only reliable methodology that is available right now. Feel free to propose something different, but it needs to meet criteria I listed.
And I use the same methodology always. Even when someone tries to state things that would benefit me directly… What are you doing here is poisoning the well!
Did they do another poll with actually valid options in structure to get valid results? Or are you talking about the one where all the options of “bad” “super bad” and “neutral” were lumped together?
Ya i think Aaron was like the safe company guy that would toe the line Bobby picked unlike bratty Jeff who would atleast try to fight.
That said Aaron feels like the person who kinda takes the blame for others and he knows it but he doesn’t mind it.
Every company has those kind of people who work for years and take the blame when no one else will.
They are good people esp for their co workers and company, but for the product or customers I don’t know.
1 Like
This one same was posted on yt too
No, it’s not. You need valid conducted polling for you to accept the results. Therefore we can’t talk about public sentiment surrounding the game because that doesn’t exist. Until then it’s all just anecdotal or laughably bad data. This is the criteria you’ve set.
The neat part is it doesn’t. It might need to meet the criteria listed to satisfy you, but I’m not you. I can agree to disagree but you insist on trying to brow beat me with the idea that I have to convince you on your terms. I’m not interested. Most people didn’t like it, and it’s spelled out.
They’re going to tell you those polls don’t count because Blizzard didn’t include options for neutral, dislike, and strongly dislike.
So the useless one…
Got it!
yes.
That’s what you are saying, not me! Here is where you are making a straw man!
I never said that nor I implied that!
So you are ok being fooled in to believing not true things?
You are ok by being duped by con artists? Because that’s where your attitude will lead you!
Lol you’ve done that throughout this entire thread but okay champ. Sorry about the poll. It’s good enough for me so I guess I’m dumb and gullible 
1 Like
No, I did not…
Quote me on that!
Your words, not mine…
You’re getting Tricksterd.
Poll has 2 positive options, one against, and one semi-neutral (allows comments but still would categorize against the Quicker Play fully as it was).
Poll results are in Trickster. 30% liked it. 70% didnt. End of discussion. Accept it and move on.
3 Likes
Yeah I’ve realized there’s no point and gave up. It’s a very weird thing to be that condescending about.
3 Likes
Every conversation with trickster is them taking one thing out of context and making a whole case about that ONE thing that wasn’t exactly the way you said it was, while ignoring everything else. And exclamation points!
Not worth it.
1 Like
People on this forum were quite positive about the whole thing while it was happening. Now suddenly it’s the worst thing ever?
I liked some aspects of it, hated others.
Push was way better. Flashpoint was better too - although it needs some extra adjustments. Escort, Hybrid and Control were all terrible though.
Some people were. Some people weren’t. Flashpoint was not remotely better. Points already cap so fast in normal Flashpoint. Cap time isn’t the issue, it’s the map size.
Push arguably was better, but realistically for a normal game of Overwatch you’d want the bot move speed to be midway between current Push and Quicker Play Push.
Poll results were about what I expected to see.
Flashpoint could do with the faster respawn times with the current capture time.
As for Push. I wonder if some mechanic where the robot moves faster as the game progresses could work - it would make comebacks easier.
All I saw from Flashpoint games were bad players feeding harder. I’ll pass. I don’t particuarly love the “team respawn” in normal quick play but it does work better for flashpoint as far as regroups go.
Hard disagree. Respawn waves are probably one of the best things they’ve ever added.
This is about the only thing I would say Quicker Play brought to light, but I didn’t actually like it in Quicker Play directly. Make Push maps 8 minutes and have the robot move 10% faster than it currently does, and I think that would be way more palatable.
You have to remember I’m used to playing with people that understand resetting and grouping.
But that’s not what they said. Why you show different questions? Trying to mislead? The questions are
- It was SO much fun
- Good but could be better
- Not my cup of tea
- Other - comment
They are much clearer than you pretended. Why did you change them?
2 Likes
Which of those 4 option is neutral then according to you?
The ones that try to mislead here is Blizzard!
Also, do you know what paraphrase is?