fiction. no server in south = 45 ping. 1 gigabit connection. respawns take longer than nano second disconnects. therefore its impossible to blame disconnects. the oppressive coding decision to artificially count wins as losses is simply bc it doesn’t apply to devs. therefore, extra goodies balances the scale.
Valid question: Would a player whose endured endless cheaters not be shaped into an exceptional, in short order? Do you know how many players cheaters are responsible for transforming into exceptionals? Competing with or overcoming cheaters will elevate you to a level of exceptionalism beyond imagination.
Usually no. Cheaters need to cheat because they cannot do what others can without cheating. You’re alluding to that fact even in your own posts by constantly looking for any excuse to justify your cheating (such as blaming your ping). Learning things like positioning from them is a fool’s errand, and there isn’t actually much to learn from a mechanical perspective (again, because you are cheating). CD usage will also be questionable.
There’s a reason why in high level comp cheaters can still manage to lose. They are not good at the game, point blank.
There is no good reason to cheat. This is my last reply to you and I’m choosing to report your posts since you are actively advocating for others to cheat because you still cannot handle the fact that others can and do climb while you cannot without cheating.
fair. however i’m not usual. i’m exceptional at any game i play. countermeasures are simply a result of developer deviousness. that’s why it’s not looked upon as cheating. since i was exceptional at ow within days. therefore, genuine cheating would be if an exceptional couldn’t pop off without exotic enhancements.
blaming? dear idiot, you said i need better internet. therefore, i was giving you courtesy info which invalidates your remark itself. my connection can handle 200 ping. the issue is complete absence of south servers. in-game responsiveness exist in cali and northeast.
Competitive integrity requires all players play on an even field with no cheats. If you cannot get a good internet connection that doesn’t constantly drop out, that’s on you.
No it doesn’t. It’s a crutch for the weak of mind who are hardstuck and mad.
No. By this logic I should go stomp gold lobbies and they’ll improve by facing a masters player all the time. It ruins competitive integrity and makes the game unfun.
No. It ruins the game for everyone. People improve regardless. But with cheaters, some people will leave.
They never have and never will.
No they are not. The system functions better without them. Cheating alters players gameplay to include things that aren’t possible for players in that rank. Such as hitting every shot, seeing through walls constantly. And so on.
You have large number but inconsistent connection. Learn better.
invalid remark. since drop outs affect no one ignoramus. smarten up. even drop outs with no return affect no one since it won’t count as a loss for other players. so think harder.
i disagree. exotic enhancements counteract developer deviousness. thus balances the scale. countering imbalance. while transforming non-cheaters into resilient perseverant exceptionals. valid and irrefutable.
exotic enhancements counteract artificial hardstuck created by developer deviousness: counting wins as losses. i get it. you want ppl to endure malicious manipulation. so that you personally feel better. cheats counteract artificial defeats.
well yes. bc eventually iron sharpens iron.
sure. at a much slower rate with no cheaters present. which is why cheaters are the bedrock of a healthy competitive community.
which creates an environment where those who overcome and excel will be catapulted into exceptionalism.
what? speak better.
excessive ineffectives who were looking to be carried to begin with, sure. all others however would eventually embrace the overwhelming odds. at which point overcoming cheaters is then possible.
millions. no excessive ineffectives get transformed however.
Drop outs effect everyone. And the losses do affect other players. It has to otherwise groups would be incentivised to have a dedicated alt account leave games when they’re losing to prevent mmr loss.
It isn’t at all valid. It’s just cheating from people terrible at the game crying about the fact that they are terrible.
Will they improve fighting masters players. Yes. Will they improve as fast as they would facing players of their own skill? No. Will it be fun? No it won’t. Will it be fair? No. It won’t. You’re an idiot.
No, they improve slower with cheaters, because cheaters alter gameplay to include elements that don’t exist with legitimate players.
They are the bedrock of an unhealthy community. Otherwise Tarkov would be the most beloved game ever.
No. It creates an environment where no one wants to play the game. The people that would become higher rank will become higher ranked regardless.
Your connections bandwidth is high but your connection is inconsistent, e.g. It drops out much alike to brown outs.
Your connection isn’t as good as you think it is. I have friends averaging 90 ping who never leave games because of a lost connection.
No. This creates player exodus’. There’s a reason dbd bleeds players when cheating is high, same with escape from tarkov, cod, etc.
People who want a fair, balanced match, will never want to play games where cheaters prosper.
Believe it or not, it isn’t a sustainable strategy to tell 99% of the playerbase that they don’t get to play ever.
Casual players don’t want to get stomped on repeat by people cheating. Competitive players, want to have competitive integrity, which is ruined when one side has an unfair advantage (e.g cheats).
You’re an idiot. No one is on your side for a reason.
fiction. if a team loses a player it doesn’t count as a loss. smarten up. earth to mars.
has to? fiction. what you described isn’t the common majority. making coding decisions which isn’t based on the common majority is what bankrupts a company to begin with. player departures use to count as a loss for all. sure. no longer.
so things are only fun when they’re easy? fascinating. cheaters elevate and accelerate the gameplay of the entire competitive community.
at turtle pace. accelerated transformation into exceptionalism is the result of enduring and overcoming adversity.
devs fraudulently counting wins as artificial losses creates exodus. for those who care not to balance the scale with extra goodies and exotic enhancements.
devs set the tone. cheaters simply implement valid countermeasures.
the silent majority is massive. which possibly includes half your friendlist.
They’re fun when they are fair. Easy, would be putting masters against gold. A fair challenge, is putting masters, against masters.
You’re an idiot.
And they will experience adversity facing people of their own rank and learning to overcome them. The average skill level of players in Overwatch has risen overtime. GM at the start of Overwatch 1 wasn’t even remotely at the level of even masters at the end of Overwatch 1.
Not nearly to the same extent as cheaters. Also, if you leave the game. You deserve a loss on your profile. You’re ruining the experience for others.
Cheaters are not moral at all. They are hated by almost everyone. They ruin competitive integrity, ruin the fairness of matches, make the game unfun, and are so egotistical that they seek to blame the game for them being terrible at it.
Nothing about this forum is silent. And is that why spectating cheaters and roasting their failures is so popular? Is that why no one defends them? Where are the videos celebrating cheating then? Where’s the people that support it?
I have yet to meet someone support cheating to improve the game other than you.
You’re a troll. Enjoy being hardstuck, I hope you’ll realise in time that it is your lack of skill keeping you there. Because others are climbing by getting better at the game, whilst you wallow in your failures.
your own match history ignoramus. perhaps start paying attention to it. next time a departure occurs with no return.
how? no such thing as putting masters against masters since players aren’t paired by elim ratio. elim ratio is measurement of actual effectiveness. since it takes picks to push and picks to stop a push. therefore the idiot is you. masters against masters lol. how? when devious devs artificially count nano second departures as automatic losses regardless if you won. smarten up.
since players aren’t paired by elim ratio to begin with, then your concern is of no significance.
if you leave and don’t return. obviously. see how dumb you are? if you return and win, you deserve a loss? see how dumb you are? smarten up.
envied? sure. hated? unsure.
says the idiot who thinks that a nano second disconnect justifies an artificial automatic loss. smarten up. bitter ignoramus.
fiction. there are more comments read than comments submitted.
the silent majority speak on the battlefield with their extra goodies of exotic enhancements.
then consider yourself lucky that i extended the courtesy of disclosing insight into the logical rational for evening the playing field. developer deviousness = player exodus. but for players who remained, exotic enhancements.
then why allow rejoins at all? see? developer deviousness confirmed.
…I haven’t had a leaver in yonks man. It’s not common enough that I would have something to reference for you.
As I said, give a source.
Elim ratio is a terrible measure of rank. I could pick Sombra, go and kill the enemy zen once and essentially afk all game. I’d have an elim ratio of infinity.
We stopped using stats to affect rank because it would artificially boost people with good mechanics but terrible game sense and positioning. It also encouraged farming of tanks and the like for stats.
If you are doing better than those in your rank, you will win more often. A win/loss ratio is the most accurate bit of data we have for whether someone should be ranked up, or ranked down.
You’re an idiot.
Masters against Masters puts people who are around the same overall skill level against each other. Some will be better in mechanics, some better in game sense.
I personally have bad mechanics for masters, but I have great positioning and game sense in masters.
Elim ratio isn’t a showcase of actual efficacy in the game. If you contribute more than the other players in the lobby, you’ll win more often.
If you do better than those in your rank, you will win more often and rank up. Elim ratio is something that cheaters want because then they can go on widow, aimbot the enemy team and pretend that they’re gm.
If you return you still ruined the experience by leaving. That’s a lost fight and you made the game worse for others to play. You deserve the loss.
If I envied cheaters I would go and spend the $10 it costs to grab a script. It’s not difficult to install, it isn’t difficult to use.
Hated is the correct word.
Nano second disconnects don’t lead to a loss. The game will attempt to reconnect with you.
You can have a ping of 2000 ms and still be in the game. Back when I was on console on crap internet I managed to reach a ping of 8000 ish and still be in the game. Which means the server doesn’t disconnect you even if you’re dead essentially for 8 full second.
If you leave the game, your internet has died and you have now turned a 5v5 into a 4v5. If your team manages to win without you, they deserve the win, not you. You didn’t contribute.
You’re an idiot.
Is that why cheaters are 1 in 33?
Majority hates them.
No. You’re an idiot. Player exodus can occur for many reasons. Developer failings are one. Cheating is another. Cheating does not stop player exodus it only enforces it.
You’re a desperate script kiddie who can’t handle the fact that you’re bad at the game, and are trying to brand yourself as a white knight for the good of the community when no one wants you to be here.
Because allowing rejoins improves match quality. But you still left and ruined a part of the experience for other players. You deserve the loss.
Get better internet, or get off the game script kiddie.