It warms the cockles of my heart to witness the forums waking up to your bs.
Youâre misunderstanding it, thatâs okay.
It warms my heart knowing Iâll be enjoying Kiriko on launch day while yall mald about F2P players having to unlock her ![]()
Once again like I said before. I dont know what you think you are achieving here. You are defending a blatantly anti-consumer decision that does nothing but harm the overall enjoyability of the game for people and you are sitting here on a high horse for no reason. People like you are why loot boxes plague every game these days. Its why pay 2 win is so prevalent. Its why all the coolest cosmetics are locked behind paywalls. Wake up. They dont know who you are. They dont care about you. Every time people make excuses and just allow this crap to continue it makes the situation worse and worse. There has to be a point where people wake up and say no. If they revert this change or even make it the first tier 1 unlock I will be happy and Im sure many others here will. But locking it behind the Battle Pass and sure before you say it, it can be âfreeâ but there are still major P2W elements here when people can just instantly unlock the character by purchasing it. In the end it is YOU who have a flawed argument and frankly its kind of pathetic to see someone defend these decisions so vehemently.
This is pretty standard F2P monetization.
F2P, costs money or time played for cosmetics/new characters
League, Valorant, Apex, Paladins, Smite, pretty much all of them
Either we get a live service game or we get a retail game. People have been begging for OW to be live service for years, here we are. Careful what you wish for I guess?
The majority of the playerbase does not touch comp at all. Thereâd be no point in locking things behind a battlepass if that were the case.
And on the flip side, people who only play comp wont dip into casual modes just to unlock new chars, theyâll just keep onetricking and pointing fingers. There isnât a way in which this doesnât ruin competitive integrity.
A false dilemma, also referred to as false dichotomy, is an informal fallacy based on a premise that erroneously limits what options are available. The source of the fallacy lies not in an invalid form of inference but in a false premise. This premise has the form of a disjunctive claim: it asserts that one among a number of alternatives must be true. This disjunction is problematic because it oversimplifies the choice by excluding viable alternatives, presenting the viewer with only two absolute choices when in fact, there could be many.
Poytheon I know you love Blizzard but Iâm genuinely curious,is there something they could do that you 100% wouldât defend?
Threads like this are why I am glad I have the ability to mute certain users on this forum.
Thanks, I forgot this was a thing.
I donât use it very often but it is a nice tool for those who do not see reason or logic.

While I think that she will be locked for comp for maybe a few weeks or even the first season, I dont think this makes the situation any better. Bad practices should be called out and this boarders on P2W. I know its free to get her but⌠is it really needed to unlock her if its free?
I have some copium that there is a big misunderstanding or that we just have a few parts of the puzzel and the âunlockâ is something simple like âWin 10 games as supportâ or such a thing.
In theory this is true. But it would mean that those who never play comp have free access to the hero - no grind. I donât think that would be seen as fair by all the comp players nor by Blizz.
Jesus Christ we were JOKING when we said youâd make this postâŚ
You are taking dangerously high doses of copium.
At this point Aaron Keller could stream himself killing a dog and youâd spin it into an OW positive.
You are legitimately on crack I think.
Take those rose tinted glasses off, seriously.
They didnât misunderstand, you just moved the goalposts.
Nothing in your OP suggested you were talking about a specific hypothetical situation. Even the title is âHaving to Unlock Heroes is Good for Competitive Integrityâ not âHaving to Unlock Heroes Could be Good for Competitive integrityâ
But it⌠doesnât give any experience for the hero in question! During the time youâre unlocking the character, you are by definition not practicing that hero! People on these forums will just think of the absolute stupidest arguments to simp for a multi-billion dollar company, I swear to god.
Does playing alongside or against a hero not improve your knowledge of the hero? It does.
do you even know what competitive integrity means