I feel like people are over blowing this just to boost their own agenda’s[views etc]
if i may give my two cents on the matter.
I see theres two sides to the coin and please correct me if i am missing something.
On one side of the coin, you have this kid who thought his political agenda should be known while being interviewed as a champion of hearthstone, [ not saying he is wrong or right, just analyzing]
On the other side of the coin, you have a company that relies on countries like china to support its business.
Now, the kid in question must have had to sign a waiver or something before participating agreeing to blizzards terms and conditions.
In these terms and conditions, there was a statement that stated all competitors must keep their political agenda’s to themselves[or something like that, I don’t remember their legal wordings]
and said kid who signed this agreement went ahead and broke the agreement, so now because blizzard punished him, they suddenly don’t care about human rights?
do I have this all correct?